Biases in self-reported height and weight measurements and their effects on modeling health outcomes
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 15741908 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Carmen D Ng (0000-0001-9453-7818, Emory University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2019 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Páginas | 100405-100405 |
| Data de publicação | 2019-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | SSM - Population Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2352-8273 • E-ISSN: 2352-8273 |
| Editora | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100405 |
| PMID | 31193386 |
| OpenAlex | W2944761142 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 11 |
| Referências citadas | 25 |
Self-reported anthropometrics are often used as proxies for measured anthropometrics, but research has shown that heights and weights are often misreported. Using the Study on global AGEing and adult health, I analyze misreporting patterns of height, weight, and BMI in China, India, Russia, and South Africa. Adjustments of self-reported heights and weights using demographic, social, and anthropometric characteristics are evaluated and found to be useful in studying the distribution of anthropometrics within a population. Measured, self-reported, and adjusted BMI are then compared in logistic regression models on the reporting of health outcomes, as well as the resulting accuracy of individual prediction. When BMI is used as a continuous variable in models of health outcomes, measured, self-reported, and adjusted BMI produce similar coefficient estimates, and so self-reported data would be a natural choice because of its accessibility and convenience. In other applications, such as models using categorical BMI and individual prediction using either continuous or categorical BMI, self-reported data in lieu of measured data might not be accurate enough, but adjustments could serve as a potential compromise
Anthropometry · Body mass index · Categorical variable · Continuous variable · Logistic regression · Regression analysis · Statistics · Body Composition Measurement Techniques · Demography · Mathematics · Medicine · Nutrition and Health in Aging · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Psychology
Perceptions and stigma of anti-obesity pharmacotherapy in adult Polish women
The influence of early diet quality on the mental health of college students
How tall am I again? A longitudinal analysis of the reliability of self-reported height
Does democracy make taller men? Cross-country European evidence
Discrepancies in self-reported and measured anthropometric measurements and indices among older Australians
The health and wellbeing of Australian social housing tenants compared to people living in other types of housing
Application of the health belief model to study weight management behavioral intentions among adults in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
The transmission of social inequalities through economic difficulties and lifestyle factors on body mass index
Beyond recent BMI
Dyadic associations between eating behaviors and body mass index in couples with a member living with overweight
A qualitative study of cognitive, behavioral, and environmental influences on Hispanic mothers’ early childhood feeding practices
A comparison of direct vs. self‐report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index
Effects of Age on Validity of Self-Reported Height, Weight, and Body Mass Index
Are fast food restaurants an environmental risk factor for obesity?
Validity of self-reported weight and height in the French Gazel cohort
Height and weight in Germany, evidence from the German Socio-Economic Panel, 2002
The determinants of misreporting weight and height
Validity of self-reported weight, height and resultant body mass index in Chinese adolescents and factors associated with errors in self-reports
Perceptions of weight and associated factors of adolescents in Jiangsu Province, China
Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 Epic–Oxford participants
Health Outcomes and Socio-economic Status Among the Elderly in China
Quantifying Quantitative Literacy
| Obras citantes distintas | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,83 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 11 |