What Should We Do About the Mismatch Between Legal Criteria for Death and How Brain Death Is Diagnosed
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 15744344 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Nathaniel M Robbins (0000-0002-1884-8275, Dartmouth College, autor correspondente), James L Bernat (0000-0003-1128-0442, Dartmouth College) |
| Ano | 2020 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Fascículo | 12 |
| Páginas | E1038-1046 |
| Data de publicação | 2020-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | The AMA Journal of Ethic (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2376-6980 • E-ISSN: 2376-6980 |
| Editora | American Medical Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1001/amajethics.2020.1038 |
| PMID | 33419505 |
| OpenAlex | W3108892655 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 6 |
Mismatch between whole-brain death criteria embedded in statutes and accepted tests physicians use to diagnose brain death have clinical and ethical implications that could undermine public trust in death pronouncements. We consider merits and drawbacks of 4 ways to address this problem
Cause of death · Disease · Pathology · Political science · Statute · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Law · Medicine · Organ Donation and Transplantation · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Psychology
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |