Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Improving the Reliability of Literature Reviews

Detection of Retracted Articles through Academic Search Engines

Dados Bibliográficos

ID16946292
AutoresElena Pastor-Ramón (0000-0003-2609-6541, Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Iván Herrera‐Peco (0000-0002-5183-5679, Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Oskia Agirre (0000-0001-8991-691X, University of the Basque Country), María García‐Puente (0000-0002-6521-665X, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz), Jose M Moran (0000-0002-5538-182X, Universidad de Extremadura, autor correspondente)
Ano2022
Volume12
Fascículo5
Páginas458-464
Data de publicação2022-05-04
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoEuropean Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2174-8144 • E-ISSN: 2254-9625
EditoraMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/ejihpe12050034
PMID35621514
OpenAlexW4225376644
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas3
Referências citadas23

Nowadays, a multitude of scientific publications on health science are being developed that require correct bibliographic search in order to avoid the use and inclusion of retracted literature in them. The use of these articles could directly affect the consistency of the scientific studies and could affect clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the capacity of the main scientific literature search engines, both general (Gooogle Scholar) and scientific (PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science), used in health sciences in order to check their ability to detect and warn users of retracted articles in the searches carried out. The sample of retracted articles was obtained from RetractionWatch. The results showed that although Google Scholar was the search engine with the highest capacity to retrieve selected articles, it was the least effective, compared with scientific search engines, at providing information on the retraction of articles. The use of different scientific search engines to retrieve as many scientific articles as possible, as well as never using only a generic search engine, is highly recommended. This will reduce the possibility of including retracted articles and will avoid affecting the reliability of the scientific studies carried out

Data science · Information retrieval · MEDLINE · Political science · Publishing · Scientific article · Scientific evidence · Scientific literature · Scopus · Search engine · Web of science · Academic integrity and plagiarism · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Computer Science · Mathematics · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • Preface of Special Issue “21st Century Health Communication Challenges

    Open Access•Carlos Ruíz-Núñez, Iván Herrera‐Peco•European Journal of Investigation…•2023

  • Finnish student teachers as a focus of teacher education research

    Open Access•Jenni Koski, Riitta‐leena Metsäpelto et al.•Educational Review•2026

  • Beef as intangible cultural heritage in Botswana

    Open Access•Delly M Chatibura•Journal of Ethnic Foods•2023

  • Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources

    Open Access•Michael Gusenbauer, Neal Haddaway•Research Synthesis Methods•2020

  • SCRUTATIOm

    Open Access•Jose M Moran, Azucena Santillán García et al.•Gaceta Sanitaria•2022

  • The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions

    Open Access•Vivek Kumar Singh, Prashasti Singh et al.•Scientometrics•2021

  • Research note. Open letter to the users of the new PubMed

    Open Access•María García‐Puente, Elena Pastor-Ramón et al.•El Profesional de la Informacion•2020

Obras citantes distintas3
Citações por ano1
Intervalo de citações2023 - 2026 (4)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 2

Ferramentas

Abrir DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae