Making Medical Decisions for Children with Profound Cognitive Disabilities

Requests by parents or other caregivers for treatment to prolong the lives of minors with profound cognitive disabilities can be ethically challenging. Some patients have very limited capacity for conscious experience, and so it becomes difficult to say that a longer life is truly good for them. For such cases, some commentators have proposed the relational potential standard as an alternative to the best interest standard. Yet, if the relational potential standard holds that requests for care ought to be honored because they respect patients' familial relationships even though they provide no benefit to patients themselves, then the proposal is objectionable. We have good ethical reasons to accept at least one element of the best interest standard: the exclusionary criteria that no one's interests but the patient's should count when making medical decisions on their behalf. This paper defends a pluralistic conception of what can be in a severely cognitively disabled minor patient's interests. This approach can yield the same result that proponents of the relational potential standard want (honoring requests for care even when providers doubt that these requests are in the patient's best interest) while avoiding committing clinicians to honoring unreasonable requests that discount the patient's other interests

Best interests · Best practice · Cognition · Cognitive disabilities · Element (criminal law) · Form of the Good · Negotiation · Pluralism (philosophy) · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations

• A Life Worth Sustaining? Bestowed Worth and Pediatric Care

  Open Access•Daniel T Kim, Xiang Yu•The Hastings Center Report•2026

  Incluir item

• Why Pediatric Ethics Needs a Theory of Goodness

  Open Access•Tyler Tate, Jenny Clark Schiff et al.•The Hastings Center Report•2026

  Incluir item

• A Theory of Justice

  Open Access•John Rawls•Theory of Justice•1999

  Incluir item

• Navigating parental requests

  JENNY KINGSLEY, Jonna Clark et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2025

  Incluir item

• The Relational Potential Standard

  Open Access•Aaron Wightman, Jennifer Kett et al.•The Hastings Center Report•2019

  Incluir item

• Lessons from the Case of Jahi McMath

  Open Access•Robert D Truog•The Hastings Center Report•2018

  Incluir item

• Toward an Ethic of Ambiguity

  John D Arras•The Hastings Center Report•1984

  Incluir item

• Reporting the Case of Baby Jane Doe

  Kathleen Kerr•The Hastings Center Report•1984

  Incluir item

• Practical Reason and Norms

  Joseph Raz•Practical Reason and Norms•1999

  Incluir item