Quantifying the Health Burden Misclassification from the Use of Different PM2.5 Exposure Tier Models

Exposure to PM 2.5 has been associated with increased mortality in urban areas. Hence, reducing the uncertainty in human exposure assessments is essential for more accurate health burden estimates. Here, we quantified the misclassification that occurred when using different exposure approaches to predict the mortality burden of a population using London as a case study. We developed a framework for quantifying the misclassification of the total mortality burden attributable to exposure to fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) in four major microenvironments (MEs) (dwellings, aboveground transportation, London Underground (LU) and outdoors) in the Greater London Area (GLA), in 2017. We demonstrated that differences exist between five different exposure Tier-models with incrementally increasing complexity, moving from static to more dynamic approaches. BenMap-CE, the open source software developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, was used as a tool to achieve spatial distribution of the ambient concentration by interpolating the monitoring data to the unmonitored areas and ultimately estimating the change in mortality on a fine resolution. Indoor exposure to PM 2.5 is the largest contributor to total population exposure concentration, accounting for 83% of total predicted population exposure, followed by the London Underground, which contributes approximately 15%, despite the average time spent there by Londoners being only 0.4%. After incorporating housing stock and time-activity data, moving from static to most dynamic metric, Inner London showed the highest reduction in exposure concentration (i.e., approximately 37%) and as a result the largest change in mortality (i.e., health burden/mortality misclassification) was observed in central GLA. Overall, our findings showed that using outdoor concentration as a surrogate for total population exposure but ignoring different exposure concentration that occur indoors and time spent in transit, led to a misclassification of 1174-1541 mean predicted mortalities in GLA. We generally confirm that increasing the complexity and incorporating important microenvironments, such as the highly polluted LU, could significantly reduce the misclassification of health burden assessments

Environmental health · Exposure assessment · Geography · Multiple exposure · Population · Statistics · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Climate Change and Health Impacts · Computer Science · Engineering · Environmental Science · Mathematics · Medicine · Urban Transport and Accessibility

• The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS)

  Open Access•Neil E Klepeis, William Nelson et al.•Journal of Exposure Science &…•2001

  Incluir item

• Air pollution abatement performances of green infrastructure in open road and built-up street canyon environments – A review

  Open Access•K V Abhijith, Prashant Kumar et al.•Atmospheric Environment (1967)•2017

  Incluir item

• Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution

  Open Access•Aaron J Cohen, Michael Brauer et al.•The Lancet•2017

  Incluir item

• Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013

  Open Access•Mohammad H Forouzanfar, Lily Alexander et al.•The Lancet•2015

  Incluir item

• Lung Cancer, Cardiopulmonary Mortality, and Long-term Exposure to Fine Particulate Air Pollution

  C Arden Pope, C Arden Pope III•JAMA•2002

  Incluir item

• A review and evaluation of intraurban air pollution exposure models

  Open Access•Michael Jerrett, M ALTAF ARAIN et al.•Journal of Exposure Science &…•2005

  Incluir item

• Reduction in Fine Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality

  Open Access•Francine Laden, Joel Schwartz et al.•American Journal of Respiratory…•2006

  Incluir item

• Air pollution removal by trees in public green spaces in Strasbourg city, France

  Open Access•Wissal Selmi, Christiane Weber et al.•Urban Forestry & Urban Greening•2016

  Incluir item

• Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015

  Open Access•Mohammad H Forouzanfar, Ashkan Afshin et al.•The Lancet•2016

  Incluir item

• A Comparison of Exposure Metrics for Traffic-Related Air Pollutants

  Open Access•Stuart Batterman, Janet Burke et al.•International Journal of…•2014

  Incluir item

• Evaluating the Long-Term Health and Economic Impacts of Central Residential Air Filtration for Reducing Premature Mortality Associated with Indoor Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) of Outdoor Origin

  Open Access•Dan Zhao, Parham Azimi et al.•International Journal of…•2015

  Incluir item

• Chronic effects of ambient air pollution on respiratory morbidities among Chinese children

  Open Access•Yang Gao, Emily Yy Chan et al.•BMC Public Health•2014

  Incluir item

• Assessing Mobility-Based Real-Time Air Pollution Exposure in Space and Time Using Smart Sensors and GPS Trajectories in Beijing

  Jing Ma, Yinhua Tao et al.•Annals of the American…•2020

  Incluir item