Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Computerized-Adaptive vs. Traditional Ratings of Depression and Suicidal Thoughts

An Assay Sensitivity Pilot Study in a Ketamine Clinical Trial

Dados Bibliográficos

ID17801300
AutoresMichael F Grunebaum (0000-0001-5940-3478, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, autor correspondente), J John Mann (0000-0002-0265-6586, New York State Psychiatric Institute), Hanga Galfalvy (0000-0001-7156-6106, Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Hanga C Galfalvy, Robert D Gibbons (0000-0002-6463-2280, University of Chicago)
Ano2021
Volume12
Páginas602976-602976
Data de publicação2021-04-07
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoFrontiers in Psychiatry (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1664-0640 • E-ISSN: 1664-0640
EditoraFrontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpsyt.2021.602976
PMID33897480
OpenAlexW3148084229
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas16

There is a public health need for improved suicide risk assessment tools. This pilot methodology study compared the assay sensitivity of computerized adaptive tests (CAT) of depression and suicidal ideation vs. traditional ratings in a randomized trial subgroup. The last 20 persons to enroll in a published ketamine trial in suicidal depression were studied. This subgroup received traditional and CAT ratings at baseline, 24 h post-infusion and follow-up week 2, 4, and 6: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, and Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation vs. the CAT-Depression Inventory and CAT-Suicide Scale. Results showed larger effect sizes (ES) for CAT compared with traditional clinician-rated and self-report scales. Coefficients of variation for baseline measurements were lower for CAT compared with traditional scales. This is the first study to show that CAT may have greater assay sensitivity for treatment effects, particularly for suicidal ideation, compared with traditional clinician-rated and non-adaptive self-rated scales in a randomized trial. The findings suggest CAT can enable quick long-term follow-up assessments via cellphone, tablet, or computer while minimizing response bias due to repeated measurement of the same symptom items. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT01700829

Beck Depression Inventory · Clinical trial · Physical therapy · Poison control · Psychiatry · Randomized controlled trial · Rating scale · Suicidal ideation · Suicide prevention · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Clinical Psychology · Medicine · Mental Health Research Topics · Psychology · Suicide and Self-Harm Studies · Emergency Medicine · Internal Medicine

  • Item Banks for Measuring Emotional Distress From the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®)

    Open Access•Paul A Pilkonis, Seung W Choi et al.•Assessment•2011

  • Assessment of suicidal intention

    Aaron T Beck, Maria Kovàcs et al.•Journal of Consulting and…•1979

  • Marginal Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Item Parameters

    Open Access•R Darrell Bock, Murray Aitkin•Psychometrika•1981

  • Full-Information Item Bi-Factor Analysis

    Open Access•Robert D Gibbons, Donald R Hedeker•Psychometrika•1992

  • A Rating Scale for Depression

    M Hamilton•Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery…•1960

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae