Revisiting Relational Pandemic Ethics in Light of the Covid-19 Abortion Bans in the United States
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 17814337 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Amy Reed‐sandoval (0000-0003-4644-1218, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2021 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 141-156 |
| Data de publicação | 2021-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1937-4577 • E-ISSN: 1937-4585 |
| Editora | University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3138/ijfab-14.1.07 |
| OpenAlex | W3135814041 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 6 |
The experiences of working-class people and those from communities of color seeking abortions in the United States before and during COVID-19 call for feminist, relational pandemic ethics. Françoise Baylis and colleagues argue for public health ethics that emphasize relational personhood, relational autonomy, social justice, and solidarity. COVID-19 abortion bans in the United States require vigilance against powerful actors who abuse these values—particularly that of solidarity—to further their political, religious, and/or economic agendas in harmful ways. Thus, efforts to promote solidarity during a pandemic must attend to social injustice and systemic oppression and provide resources to vulnerable people
Abortion · Autonomy · Criminology · Injustice · Oppression · Personhood · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Solidarity · Ethics in medical practice · Gender Studies · Law · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Reproductive Health and Technologies
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |