Changing land-use metrics in mass housing

Over the past three decades, Turkish cities have experienced significant increases in terms of building densities. This densification is evident not only through taller buildings and increased floor numbers, but also in the balance between built areas and open spaces and the reduction of amenity areas. This study examines the relationship between building density and land use in mass housing projects through objective, measurable and comparable parameters. The research focuses on eight publicly developed mass housing projects in Kocaeli-İzmit, Türkiye. A descriptive mixed-methods case study approach is used together with quantitative analysis of direct measurement and longitudinal comparison of land-use metrics, e.g. floor area ratio (FAR), building coverage ratio (BCR) and building proximity index (BPI). Amenity provision is assessed through normalised per dwelling-unit calculations. These objective measurements are supplemented by qualitative thematic analysis derived from semi-structured interviews (n = 15) with sector professionals, providing causal insights into the observed design shifts. The study demonstrates increasingly higher building densities in housing projects and less open space. This highlights the need to review land and urbanisation policies that cause density intensification. POLICY RELEVANCE This study identifies a structural shift in Türkiye’s public mass housing, moving from social-benefit-oriented models toward systematic density maximisation. Empirical analysis reveals a consistent trend of increased densification, while green spaces and amenity provisions decline. A critical finding for policymakers is the ‘excluded area loophole’, where regulatory frameworks allow specific building components to bypass official FAR calculations, leading to higher realised density than initially planned. To ensure long-term urban liveability, key actions for practitioners and authorities include: (1) reforming zoning legislations to close loopholes that allow the exploitation of ‘excluded areas’ so that the expansion of building mass beyond environmental capacities becomes possible; (2) integrating spatial quality metrics, such as the BPI, into planning standards to serve natural light and ventilation; and (3) isolating amenity provision from market-driven land-cost pressures through targeted government interventions and subsidies

Amenity · Descriptive statistics · Empirical research · Land use · Real estate · Turkish · Urbanization · Urban and Rural Development Challenges · Urban Planning and Governance · Urbanization and City Planning

• Toward a Redefinition of Density

  Open Access•Amos Rapoport•Environment and Behavior•1975

  Incluir item

• Urban Form and Social Sustainability

  Open Access•Glen Bramley, Sinéad Power•Environment and Planning B…•2008

  Incluir item

• The Built Environment and Mental Health

  Gary W Evans•Journal of Urban Health•2003

  Incluir item

• It all used to be better? Different generations on continuity and change in urban children's daily use of space

  Lia Karsten•Children s Geographies•2005

  Incluir item

• Shaping and designing model policies for land use planning

  Open Access•M G Lloyd, MG Lloyd et al.•Land Use Policy•2007

  Incluir item

• Green-space preservation and allocation for sustainable greening of compact cities

  Open Access•C Y Jim•Cities•2004

  Incluir item

• Factors affecting open building implementation in high density mass housing design in Hong Kong

  Open Access•Joseph Francis Wong•Habitat International•2010

  Incluir item

• The Compact City

  Open Access•Elizabeth Burton•Urban Studies•2000

  Incluir item

• Creating the Garden City

  Open Access•Belinda Yuen•Urban Studies•1996

  Incluir item

• Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice

  Open Access•Jennifer R Wolch, Jennifer Wolch et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2014

  Incluir item

• Sustainable Urban Forms

  Open Access•Y Jabareen, Yosef Rafeq Jabareen•Journal of Planning Education and…•2006

  Incluir item