Feminism against Biocapitalism
Gestational Surrogacy and the Limits of the Labor Paradigm
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 19002664 |
|---|---|
| Autores | J Oksala (0000-0002-1323-3036, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2019 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 883-904 |
| Data de publicação | 2019-05-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0097-9740 • E-ISSN: 1545-6943 |
| Editora | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/702031 |
| OpenAlex | W2946093534 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 14 |
| Referências citadas | 25 |
In the theoretical literature on biocapitalism, commercial gestational surrogacy is often treated as a paradigm of the new forms of labor that have emerged with it. I begin by assessing Melinda Cooper and Catherine Waldby’s version of this idea in their influential 2014 book Clinical Labor. Their argument for understanding gestational surrogacy as labor can be interpreted as continuing the tradition of Marxist feminism that demands recognition and adequate compensation for women’s socially reproductive labor. My key aim is to show that once we submit commercial gestational surrogacy to a rigorous Marxist-feminist analysis, however, it becomes difficult to understand it as a form of labor. While I acknowledge some of the political advantages of the labor paradigm, I develop a sustained critique of it by focusing on its theoretical and political shortcomings. I analyze the functional role that commercial gestational surrogacy occupies in the dynamics of global capitalism and identify the aspects that distinguish it from other forms of waged care work. My main concern is not the correct application of Marx or his labor theory of value but rather the feminist political and ethical consequences that follow from the theoretical question of how we conceive of gestational surrogacy and how we theorize the processes of value production on which biocapitalism relies. The goal is to show how different theoretical understandings of gestational surrogacy have radically different political consequences for the feminist debates surrounding it
Argument (complex analysis) · Capitalism · Economics · Feminism · Marxist philosophy · Neoclassical economics · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Sociology · Value (mathematics) · Gender Studies · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · Law · Medicine · Reproductive Health and Technologies
The Role of Temporary Marriage in the Formation of a ‘Modern’ Islamic Sexual and Relational Ethics for Halal Dating among Young Pious Muslim Men
‘Jeff’s Balls’
Assisted gestative technologies
Social reproduction theory and the capitalist ‘form’ of social reproduction
Care, Ecology, and the Crisis of Eco-social Reproduction
(Un)Desired Families
Dirty Wombs and Cheap Whiteness
Capitalism, Procreation, and Gender
Hypogonadism. Diagnosis, masculinity, and capital in narratives about testosterone deficiency
Selling under stigma
Revisiting surrogacy in India
Feminist Demands and the Problem of Housework
Visa Stamps for Injections
Visceral Acts
Biocapital
Dolly Mixtures
Clinical Labor
Life Support
Sustainable Capital? The Neoliberalization of Nature and Knowledge in the European “Knowledge-based Bio-economy”
Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory
The Visible Human Project
Capital
Materialist Feminism
Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale
Marxism and the Oppression of Women
Expropriation and Exploitation in Racialized Capitalism
Automatic Subjects
Not an ‘Angel’, not a ‘Whore’
Industrial Dynamics and the Problem of Nature
Reconceiving Surrogacy
Ecofeminism as Politics
Hidden in Plain Sight
Theorizing the Bioeconomy
"Limits of "Labor
The social construction of surrogacy research
It May Be Her Eggs But It's My Blood
Under Western Eyes
Potential, Risk, and Return in Transnational Indian Gestational Surrogacy
| Obras citantes distintas | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2,33 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 13 |