Labor’s Capital and Worker Well-Being
Do US Pension Funds Benefit Labor Interests
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 19004545 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Larry Liu (0000-0002-5558-1995, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA), Adam Goldstein (0000-0003-1127-3541, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2021 |
| Volume | 100 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 1080-1109 |
| Data de publicação | 2021-03-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Social Forces (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0037-7732 • E-ISSN: 1534-7605 |
| Editora | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/sf/soab025 |
| OpenAlex | W3143806273 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 25 |
Since the 1980s, the shareholder value revolution has undermined the position of workers and organized labor within US firms. At the same time, workers have paradoxically become one of the largest classes of shareholders through labor pension funds (LPF), including state public employee funds and private sector union-affiliated funds. Does workers’ concentrated ownership of capital in LPF represent a mechanism to advance worker interests against the prevailing wage, benefit, and jobs squeeze in publicly traded firms? This article links data on US state pension funds’ investments and shareholder activism to firm-level data on work and employment outcomes from 2001–2016. LPF shareholder proposals targeting large firms have declined over time. However, panel regression models show that intra-firm mobilization by LPF in the form of shareholder proposals is associated with modestly improved worker outcomes. There is no evidence that greater ownership share by public pension funds (PPF) is associated with more labor-friendly outcomes. This null association obtains even when focusing only on ownership by the most socially activist funds, or those from Democrat-controlled states. Nor does PPF ownership buffer workers from the negative impact of extractive hedge funds. Together, the results help reconcile contending accounts of pension fund capitalism’s effects on worker well-being. The analysis contributes to the sociological study of financialization, corporate governance, work and employment, and labor movements
Business · Corporate governance · Economics · Global assets under management · Hedge fund · Institutional investor · Labour economics · Pension · Position (finance) · Shareholder · Shareholder value · Wage · Employment and Welfare Studies · Finance · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Labor Movements and Unions
Shared Capitalism at Work
Divested
The Rise of the Working-Class Shareholder
Financialization and the Decline of Organized Labor
Can private pension funds be socially responsible? The US experience
Private Equity at Work. When Wall Street Manages Main Street
Pension funds, privatization, and the limits to “Workers Capital”
Polarization and Policy
The financialization of policy preferences
The origins and early diffusion of 'shareholder value' in the United States
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |