The woman reader in Rebecca Mead’s My life in Middlemarch

Before the entry of feminist scholars into the field, literary theory either had no interest in the woman reader or used her to represent the type of reading that favours identification, escape and pleasure over engagement with the aesthetic and formal aspects of a text. According to feminist cultural and literary theorists such as Charlotte Brunsdon and Rita Felski, the woman reader has typically been defined as passive and uncreative, her interests as trivial and sentimental, her reading as consequently apolitical. Feminist literary theory and feminist cultural studies have long challenged the sharp divide between feminist and ‘ordinary’ women readers, academic and non-academic readers, creative and uncreative readers, pointing out that they are more alike than we are led to believe because they share certain affective and cognitive attributes. This artificial dichotomy is also called into question by popular memoirs on books and reading, which showcase the creativity of non-academic reading. One example is the 2014 book My Life in Middlemarch, journalist Rebecca Mead’s account of her lifelong relationship with George Eliot’s novel. Mead’s book, which combines literary criticism, biography and memoir, highlights the impact literature can have on its readers. I read Mead’s book as an example of Rita Felski’s theoretical concept of a ‘positive aesthetics’, a framework for reading texts that blends criticism and analysis with attachment and love. Using Felski’s categories of textual engagement, such as recognition, enchantment and knowledge, I argue that Mead’s project, by giving equal weight to emotional and intellectual aspects of reading, represents an important step in bridging the divide between academic and non-academic readers

Aesthetics · Art · Biography · Creativity · Criticism · Linguistics · Literary criticism · Literary theory · Literature · Memoir · Pleasure · Sociology · Irish and British Studies · Philosophy · Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies · Psychology · Race, History, and American Society · Social Psychology

• The Limits of Critique

  Rita Felski•Limits of Critique•2015

  Incluir item

• The Distinction of Fiction

  Dorrit Cohn•The distinction of fiction•2000

  Incluir item

• Loving with a Vengeance

  Tania Modleski•Loving with a Vengeance•2008

  Incluir item

• The Feminist, the Housewife, and the Soap Opera

  Charlotte Brunsdon•The feminist, the housewife, and…•2000

  Incluir item

• Uses of Literature

  Open Access•Rita Felski•Uses of Literature•2008

  Incluir item

• Reading the Romance

  Janice A Radway•Reading the Romance•2009

  Incluir item

• Literary Theory

  Jonathan Culler, Jonathan D Culler•Literary theory•2011

  Incluir item

• On Deconstruction

  Jonathan Culler, Vincent B Leitch et al.•Comparative Literature•1984

  Incluir item

• The Gender of Modernity

  Rita Felski•Gender of Modernity•1995

  Incluir item

• Cultural Theory and Popular Culture

  Jennifer Storey, John Storey•Cultural Theory and Popular Culture•2018

  Incluir item

• Critical capital

  N Holm•Cultural Studies•2020

  Incluir item

• The Resisting Reader

  Melvin J Friedman, Judith Fetterley•American Literature•1979

  Incluir item

• Viewing, Reading, Listening

  Norman K Denzin, Jon Cruz et al.•Social Forces•1998

  Incluir item