Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Adaptation and validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care in the French context

Dados Bibliográficos

ID19040693
AutoresNicolas Krucien (0000-0001-9179-6558, autor correspondente), Marc Le Vaillant, Nathalie Pelletier-Fleury (0000-0002-4821-4863)
Ano2014
Volume14
Fascículo1
Páginas269-269
Data de publicação2014-06-19
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoBMC Health Services Research (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1472-6963 • E-ISSN: 1472-6963
EditoraBioMed Central (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1186/1472-6963-14-269
PMID24947538
PMCIDPMC4094668
OpenAlexW2074875318
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas2
Referências citadas34

BACKGROUND: Chronic diseases are major causes of disability worldwide with rising prevalence. Most patients suffering from chronic conditions do not always receive optimal care. The Chronic Care Model (CCM) has been developed to help general practitioners making quality improvements. The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) questionnaire was increasingly used in several countries to appraise the implementation of the CCM from the patients' perspective. The objective of this study was to adapt the PACIC questionnaire in the French context and to test the validity of this adaptation in a sample of patients with multiple chronic conditions. METHODS: The PACIC was translated into French language using a forward/backward procedure. The French version was validated using a sample of 150 patients treated for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and having multiple chronic co-morbidities. Several forms of validity were analysed: content; face; construct; and internal consistency. The construct validity was investigated with an exploratory factorial analysis. RESULTS: The French-version of the PACIC consisted in 18 items, after merging two pairs of items due to redundancy. The high number of items exhibiting floor/ceiling effects and the non-normality of the ratings suggested that a 5-points rating scale was somewhat inappropriate to assess the patients' experience of care. The construct validity of the French-PACIC was verified and resulted in a bi-dimensional structure. Overall this structure showed a high level of internal consistency. The PACIC score appeared to be significantly related to the age and self-reported health of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: A French-version of the PACIC questionnaire is now available to evaluate the patients' experience of care and to monitor the quality improvements realised by the medical structures. This study also pointed out some methodological issues about the PACIC questionnaire, related to the format of the rating scale and to the structure of the questionnaire

Chronic care · Chronic disease · Construct validity · Content validity · Family medicine · Normality · Patient satisfaction · Physical therapy · Psychiatry · Psychometrics · Chronic Disease Management Strategies · Clinical Psychology · Diabetes Management and Education · Medicine · Nursing · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare

  • Using confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis to examine the dimensionality of The Patient Assessment of Care for Chronic Illness Care (Pacic)

    Open Access•Sylvie D Lambert, Jane McCusker et al.•Quality of Life Research•2021

  • Patients’ Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (Pacic)

    Open Access•Viktória Törő, Zsigmond Kósa et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Improving Primary Care for Patients With Chronic Illness

    Thomas Bodenheimer, Edward H Wagner et al.•JAMA•2002

  • Improving Primary Care for Patients With Chronic Illness

    Thomas Bodenheimer•JAMA•2002

  • Ordinal Versions of Coefficients Alpha and Theta for Likert Rating Scales

    Open Access•Bruno D Zumbo, Anne M Gadermann et al.•Journal of Modern Applied…•2007

  • Improving Chronic Illness Care

    Edward H Wagner, Brian T Austin et al.•Health Affairs•2001

  • The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United States

    ELIZABETH A MCGLYNN, Steven M Asch et al.•New England Journal of Medicine•2003

  • Evidence On The Chronic Care Model In The New Millennium

    Katie Coleman, Brian T Austin et al.•Health Affairs•2009

  • Sample size in factor analysis.

    Robert C Maccallum, Keith F Widaman et al.•Psychological Methods•1999

  • Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.

    Robert C Maccallum, Michael W Browne et al.•Psychological Methods•1996

  • Quality of integrated chronic care measured by patient survey

    Open Access•Hubertus J M Vrijhoef, Rieneke Berbee et al.•Health Expectations•2009

  • The potential for integrated care programmes to improve quality of care as assessed by patients with COPD

    Open Access•Jane M Cramm, Maureen Rutten‐van Mölken et al.•International Journal of…•2012

  • Care delivery pathways for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in England and the Netherlands

    Open Access•Cecile M A Utens, J A M Maarse et al.•International Journal of…•2012

  • Development and Validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (Pacic)

    Open Access•Russell E Glasgow, Edward H Wagner et al.•Medical Care•2005

  • Development and Validation of the Older Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (O-Pacic) Scale After Hospitalization

    Open Access•Jane M Cramm, Anna P Nieboer•Social Indicators Research•2014

Obras citantes distintas2
Citações por ano0,4
Intervalo de citações2021 - 2022 (2)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae