Shareability of thought and Frege's constraint
A reply to Onofri
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 19075841 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Romain Bourdoncle (0000-0003-4056-3265, Institut Jean Nicod, École Normale Supérieure, EHESS-CNRS-PSL, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2022 |
| Volume | 67 |
| Fascículo | 9 |
| Páginas | 3298-3305 |
| Data de publicação | 2022-02-08 |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Inquiry (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0020-174X • E-ISSN: 1502-3923 |
| Editora | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0020174x.2022.2034526 |
| OpenAlex | W4211103234 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 7 |
Onofri [Onofri, A. 2018. ‘The Publicity of Thought.’ Philosophical Quarterly 68 (272): 521–541.] proposes an individuation criterion for thoughts that purports to satisfy both shareability (the notion that different thinkers, or a single thinker at different times, can and generally do think type-identical thoughts) and Frege's constraint (according to which two thoughts are different if it is possible for a rational subject to endorse one while rejecting the other). I argue that his proposal fails to satisfy Frege's constraint. Then I propose a modification to Onofri's proposal to fix the problem
Epistemology · Individuation · Linguistics · Political science · Principle of compositionality · Psychoanalysis · Publicity · Sociology · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
| Citações por ano | 0,5 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Altamente citado | Não |