Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

More Productive Bodies Faster! Human Capital and Anti‐Intellectualism in Danish University Reform

Dados Bibliográficos

ID19213633
AutoresJohan Gøtzsche-Astrup (0000-0001-7514-1375, Aarhus University), K Villadsen (0000-0002-9966-942X, Copenhagen Business School)
Ano2026
Data de publicação2026-05-17
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoBritish Journal of Sociology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0007-1315 • E-ISSN: 1468-4446
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1468-4446.70129
PMID42143762
OpenAlexW7161489437
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas7

This article examines the current Danish reform of master's programmes as a case of contested marketization in higher education. While the reform aims to produce "labour-market-relevant" graduates by shortening degrees, introducing corporate programmes, and reducing enrolment, it reveals a fundamental tension between two competing economic logics: a neoliberal conception of students as human capital and a conventional view of labour as quantifiable work time. The emphasis on the latter by the Danish coalition government, particularly the Social Democrats, parallels their glorification of vocational work and disdain for intellectualism. Drawing on policy documents and public debate, the article shows how these logics coexist uneasily within the reform, combining aspirations to optimize students' individual investment decisions with efforts to increase the aggregate labour supply. The article further analyses the critiques the reform has generated. While traditional critiques emphasize the erosion of universities' role in cultivating democratic citizens, a "market critique" emerging from economic actors highlights the reform's failure on its own terms. This critique exposes the limits of centralized planning in engineering labour-market outcomes and points to unintended consequences. Building on this analysis, the article develops the concept of "impure resistance" to describe forms of critique that operate within, rather than outside, market rationalities. It argues that such internal critiques can open new avenues for coalition-building in contexts where democratic arguments struggle to resonate, while also underscoring their limitations. The article concludes that effective resistance to marketization must mobilize its internal contradictions rather than oppose it from a single normative standpoint

Capitalism · Criticism · Danish · Democracy · Human capital · Marketization · Normative · Unintended consequences · Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies · Higher Education and Employability · Higher Education Governance and Development

  • Changing the World? The Politics of Activism and Impact in the Neoliberal University

    Open Access•Carl Rhodes, C Wright et al.•Organization•2018

  • Beyond neoliberal policy ideologies

    Open Access•Ronni Laursen, M Madsen•Journal of Education Policy•2025

  • Movement Framing and Discursive Opportunity Structures

    Open Access•Holly J Mccammon, Courtney Sanders Muse et al.•American Sociological Review•2007

  • Neoliberalism with Scandinavian characteristics

    Open Access•Rune Møller Stahl•Capital & Class•2022

  • Undoing the Demos

    Wendy Brown•Undoing the Demos•2015

  • Daring the Truth

    Open Access•A Folkers•Theory Culture & Society•2016

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae