Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Impact of the Russian-Ukrainian Crisis on the Approaches of German Parties towards Energy Transition

Dados Bibliográficos

ID19367237
AutoresDenis O Vakarchuk (Russian State University for the Humanities), A A Ivoninskaia (Russian State University for the Humanities)
Ano2024
Fascículo2 (123)
Páginas57-69
Data de publicação2024-12-15
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoContemporary Europe (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0201-7083 • E-ISSN: 0201-7083
EditoraThe Russian Academy of Sciences (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.31857/s0201708324020050
OpenAlexW4399725761
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas16

Since the 1990s, Germany has been following the concept of the energy transition. A long political debate on the necessity of its implementation ended after the Fukushima Daiichi accident in 2011, when a consensus emerged among the leading German parties on the main problems of the energy transition. However, the Russian-Ukrainian conflict of 2022 has actualized the use of fossil fuels, NPPs and has led to a change in the established positions of the German parties on achieving carbon neutrality. The authors of the article used discourse-analytical approach to study the issue and examined the changes in Germany's energy policy in the context of the crisis through the perspective of the transformation of the discourse of German parties. The aim of the study was to identify discursive shifts as well as dominant narratives in the rhetoric of German parties on the energy transition problem after the February 2022 events. It was assumed that the energy transition discourse would remain dominant in the rhetoric of the German parties in light of the onset of the crisis. As an alternative hypothesis, it was assumed that a number of German parties would shift towards the energy mix discourse, making it dominant and most influential, leading to a revision of the German energy policy. The content analysis of the FRG parties' tweets confirmed the alternative hypothesis. The authors conclude that after the beginning of the energy crisis, under the influence of public sentiment, the CDU/CSU, FDP and Left shifted towards the energy mix discourse, making it dominant and more influential than the energy transition discourse. This contributed to the adjustment of the German government's policy in the energy sector

Economic system · Economics · Energy policy · Energy transition · German · Linguistics · Narrative · Neutrality · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Rhetoric · Sociology · Ukrainian · Arctic and Russian Policy Studies · Global Energy Security and Policy · Global Political and Economic Relations · History · Law

  • Political agenda on Twitter during the 2016 Spanish elections

    Open Access•Laura Alonso-Muñoz, Andreu Casero-Ripollés•Communication & Society•1970

  • A turn to geopolitics

    Open Access•T Wiertz, Lilith Kuhn et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2023

  • Muslims in social media discourse

    Open Access•A Tornberg, Petter Törnberg•Discourse Context & Media•2016

  • The overlooked role of discourse in breaking carbon lock‐in

    Open Access•Pia Mamut, Angela Oels•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2019

  • Populism in the era of Twitter

    Open Access•Homero Gil De Zúñiga, Karolina Koc-Michalska et al.•New Media & Society•2020

  • Energy transition on the rise

    Anna Leipprand, Christian Flachsland et al.•Innovation The European Journal…•2016

  • Opposition in times of crisis

    Open Access•Tom Louwerse, Ulrich Sieberer et al.•West European Politics•2021

  • Hashtag Wars

    Open Access•Felipe Bonow Soares, Raquel Recuero•Social Media + Society•2021

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae