Student learning in higher education
A longitudinal analysis and faculty discussion
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 19379568 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Catherine E Mintz (0000-0002-8959-0013, James Madison University), Catherine E Mathers (James Madison University, autor correspondente), Sara J Finney (0000-0002-9194-6808, James Madison University), John D Hathcoat (James Madison University) |
| Ano | 2018 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Fascículo | 8 |
| Páginas | 1211-1227 |
| Data de publicação | 2018-11-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0260-2938 • E-ISSN: 1469-297X |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02602938.2018.1443202 |
| OpenAlex | W2792374589 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 7 |
| Referências citadas | 25 |
Answering a call put forth decades ago by the higher education community and the federal government, we investigated the impact of US college coursework on student learning gains. Students gained, on average, 3.72 points on a 66-item test of quantitative and scientific reasoning after experiencing 1.5 years of college. Gain scores were unrelated to the number of quantitative and scientific reasoning courses completed when controlling and not controlling for students’ personal characteristics. Unexpectedly, yet fortunately, gain scores showed no discernable difference when corrected for low test-taking effort, which indicated test-taking effort did not compromise the validity of the test scores. When gain scores were disaggregated by amount of completed coursework, the estimated gain scores of students with quantitative and scientific reasoning coursework were smaller than what quantitative and scientific reasoning faculty expected or desired. In sum, although students appear on average to be making gains in quantitative and scientific reasoning, there is not a strong relationship between learning gains and students’ quantitative and scientific reasoning coursework, and the gains are less than desired by faculty. We discuss implications of these findings for student learning assessment and learning improvement processes
Coursework · Mathematics education · Scientific reasoning · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Innovative Teaching Methods · Psychology · Student Assessment and Feedback
From Impact Accounting to Accounting for the Loops
Enhancing Development of Competencies by Means of Continuous Improvement Processes
The content aspect of validity in a rubric-based assessment system for course syllabuses
Antecedents of examinee motivation during low-stakes tests
Objective outcome evaluation of a leadership course utilising the positive youth development approach in Hong Kong
Connecting assessment practices with curricula and pedagogy via implementation fidelity data
Assessing the learning achievement of students from different college entrance channels
Academically Adrift
How college affects students
Assessing student learning outcomes internationally
Student motivation in low-stakes assessment contexts
Assessing student learning outcomes in higher education
The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research
Investigating student learning gains in college
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
A power primer
| Obras citantes distintas | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,88 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 7 |