Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Re‐birthing the monstrous

James Whale's (Mis) reading of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

Dados Bibliográficos

ID19424263
AutoresCaroline Joan S Picart (University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire, autor correspondente)
Ano1998
Volume15
Fascículo4
Páginas382-404
Data de publicação1998-12-01
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoCritical Studies in Mass Communication (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0739-3180 • E-ISSN: 1529-5036
EditoraInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/15295039809367056
OpenAlexW1991149718
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas12

The myth of male self‐birthing (or parthenogenesis), immortalized in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, undergoes a crucial transformation in James Whale's film. This re‐envisaging of the “Frankenstein complex”; is significant insofar as it reveals hidden gendered assumptions and anxieties concerning technology. At an initial level, Whale's film downplays what Rushing and Frentz call the “dystopian”; aspects of the Frankensteinian complex, in comparison with the novel, as is evidenced in the film's elimination of sexual ambiguity and a tacked‐on happy ending. Yet the resultant strain in excising critical aspects of Mary Shelley's novel is so great that the film ends up both veiling and unveiling its severe repression, and as such, both reinforces and undercuts its patriarchal aspirations. Associated with this strained reinforcement and critique of patriarchal politics is an expression of the ‘flip side”; or “shadow”; portrait of the dominant Western myth of technology as progress

Aesthetics · Ambiguity · Art · Art history · Dystopia · Literature · Mythology · Political science · Politics · Portrait · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Whale · Comics and Graphic Narratives · Gender Studies · Gothic Literature and Media Analysis · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Rhetoric and Communication Studies

  • The State of the Art in Feminist Scholarship in Communication

    Open Access•Bonnie J Dow, Celeste M Condit•Journal of Communication•2005

  • Protecting Patriarchy

    E Michele Ramsey•Feminist Media Studies•2005

  • Desire as Resistance

    Janice Odom•Women s Studies in Communication•2016

  • What's in a Frame

    Open Access•Ann Marie Adams•The Journal of Popular Culture•2009

  • The Frankenstein Myth in contemporary cinema

    Janice Hocker Rushing, Thomas S Frentz•Critical Studies in Mass…•1989

  • Private Novels, Public Films

    Thomas L Erskine, Thomas Erskine et al.•South Atlantic Review•1990

  • Mary Shelley & "Frankenstein"

    L J Swingle, William Veeder•South Atlantic Review•1988

  • The politics of adaptation

    Wayne J McMullen, Martha Solomon•Text and Performance Quarterly•1994

  • Dionysos

    Carl Kerenyi, Ralph Manheim•Dionysos•1976

  • It had no voice to it”

    Brenda Cooper, David Descutner•Quarterly Journal of Speech•1996

  • The Great War and Modern Memory

    Paul Fussell•The SHAFR Guide Online•2017

  • Hollywood Convention and Film Adaptation

    Debra Fried•Theatre Journal•1987

  • Selected Film Criticism, 1923-1931

    Johannes Von Moltke•New German Critique•2020

Citações por ano0,19
Intervalo de citações2005 - 2016 (12)
Altamente citadoNão

Ferramentas

Abrir DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae