Social and behavioural factors associated with HIV seroconversion in homosexual men attending a central London STD clinic

An unmatched retrospective case control study was conducted to test the feasibility of investigating social and behavioural factors which may have contributed to recent HIV seroconversion in a group of homosexual men. Participants, recruited from a London sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic, were sexually active and had had a negative HIV test with a subsequent test (positive (cases) or negative (controls)) within three to 15 months. Twenty cases and 22 controls were recruited between February and October 1995. There was no difference between cases and controls in: the number of regular or casual sexual partners, the proportion who were unaware of their regular partners' serostatus (cases 60%, controls 59%), or the proportion who had known HIV-positive regular partners (cases 20%, controls 23%). A significant difference in sexual behaviour was found only when the HIV status of partners, if known, was taken into account: cases were more likely than controls to have had unprotected receptive anal intercourse with a partner not known to be HIV-negative (OR = 5.5, CI = 1.15-29.50). Fifty per cent of the cases and 27% of the controls acquired acute STDs between the two HIV tests. All participants achieved high self-efficacy scores, but the controls believed their peers placed a greater value on safer sex. Cases cited emotional issues and the use of drugs and alcohol as contributing to their seroconversion, whereas controls cited a commitment to safer sex and the avoidance of high-risk situations as contributing to their remaining HIV-negative. The results illustrate the importance of acknowledging the concept of 'negotiated safety' in studies of sexual behaviour; seroconversion was only associated with unprotected sex with a partner not known to be HIV-negative. Despite high self-efficacy scores, indicating the skills to negotiate safer sex, high levels of unsafe anal intercourse were reported. Differences between cases and controls included the importance of safer sex, periods of emotional vulnerability, influence of peers and the appropriate use of condoms. There is a need for these results to be confirmed in a larger and more powerful study

Casual · Environmental health · Population · Seroconversion · Serostatus · Sexual intercourse · Sexually transmitted disease · Syphilis · Viral load · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Demography · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk · HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions · Medicine · Immunology

• Alcohol Use and High-Risk Sexual Behavior Among Men Who Have Sex With Men

  Peter A Vanable, David J Mckirnan et al.•Health Psychology•2004

  Incluir item

• Infectious Behaviour

  Open Access•B D Adam•Social Theory & Health•2006

  Incluir item

• Urban African-American Men Speak Out on Sexual Partner Concurrency

  Open Access•Michael P Carey, Kate B Carey et al.•AIDS and Behavior•2008

  Incluir item

• Differences between HIV-positive gay men who ‘frequently’, ‘sometimes’ or ‘never’ engage in unprotected anal intercourse with serononconcordant casual partners

  Patrick Rawstorne, Andrea Fogarty et al.•AIDS Care•2007

  Incluir item

• Seroconversion in context

  Susan Kippax, Sean Slavin et al.•AIDS Care•2003

  Incluir item

• Aids optimism, condom fatigue, or self‐esteem? Explaining unsafe sex among gay and bisexual men

  B D Adam, Winston Husbands et al.•The Journal of Sex Research•2005

  Incluir item

• Accounts of HIV Seroconversion Among Substance-Using Gay and Bisexual Men

  Open Access•Jeffrey P Aguinaldo, Ted Myers et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2009

  Incluir item

• HIV Prevention Rationalities and Serostatus in the Risk Narratives of Gay Men

  Open Access•Mark D M Davis, Mark Davis•Sexualities•2002

  Incluir item