Integrating family-based interventions into specialty court programs

Qualitative guidance from sex trafficking specialty court participants and their supportive family members

Dados Bibliográficos

ID19485751
AutoresAaron Murnan (0000-0002-4742-7592, The Ohio State University, autor correspondente), Jane Mahon (0009-0002-8750-3171, University of Cincinnati), Gwen Jackson (Advisory Board Company (United States)), Symone Pate (0000-0002-7601-0008, University of Cincinnati), Susan Thompson (0000-0001-9689-1490, Advisory Board Company (United States)), Christina Stewart (Advisory Board Company (United States)), Jennifer Brown (0000-0001-7418-1172, Purdue University West Lafayette), Sarah Manchak, Sarah M Manchak (0000-0002-4703-4107, University of Cincinnati), Melinda Butsch Kovacic (0000-0001-6907-1446, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center)
Ano2026
Volume14
Fascículo1
Data de publicação2026-06-09
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoHealth & Justice (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2194-7899 • E-ISSN: 2194-7899
EditoraSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1186/s40352-026-00421-4
PMID42262694
OpenAlexW7164041967
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas49

BACKGROUND: The intersection of sex trade involvement and substance use disorder is a deeply complex and tragic issue for many women, as decades of research reflect that traditional substance use treatment modalities often fail to meet many of these women's unique needs. Sex trafficking specialty court programs constitute a unique and promising avenue to deliver evidence-based practices to treat substance use disorders and to support health and well-being among this largely service disconnected and marginalized population. A growing body of evidence suggests these specialty court programs may be strengthened by the inclusion of family-based interventions. A critical preliminary step to the potential integration of family interventions is the development of processes to identify and engage supportive family members, as well as guidelines on discerning which family members' inclusion is likely to be beneficial versus detrimental. The current study provides direct insights from sex trafficking specialty court participants and their family members regarding family involvement within specialty court treatment programming and potential family therapy services. METHODS: Fifteen family dyads consisting of one sex trafficking specialty court program participant paired with a supportive family member (identified by program participants) were invited to participate in interviews exploring best practices for identifying and engaging supportive family members in sex trafficking specialty court programming. Inductive Content Analysis was used to analyze interview transcript data. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: (1) characteristics and dynamics within familial relationships; (2) selection criteria for family members to be invited to participate; (3) barriers to successful family participation; and (4) perceptions of family therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights to inform efforts to engage family supports through the development and integration of family interventions that may bolster substance use treatment success among sex trafficking specialty court participants

Inclusion (mineral) · Legalization · Modalities · Psychological intervention · Public health · Qualitative research · Specialty · Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects · Sex work and related issues · Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes