Reflections, impact and recommendations of a co‐produced qualitative study with young people who have experience of mental health difficulties
Dados Bibliográficos
BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence of genuine equal partnership where power is shared with young people with mental health difficulties throughout all research stages, particularly in data collection and analysis. OBJECTIVE: To describe how our qualitative study, exploring young peoples' perceptions on the feasibility of using technology to detect mental health deterioration, was co-produced using principles of co-production, whilst reflecting on impact, challenges and recommendations. METHODS: Young people with experience of mental health difficulties were appointed and then worked with researchers throughout all research stages. The study was evaluated against the five principles of co-production. Reflections from researchers and young people were collected throughout. RESULTS: Seven young people formed an initial Young People's Advisory Group (YPAG); three became co-researchers. Reflection was key throughout the process. Sharing power became easier and more evident as trust, confidence and mutual respect grew over time, particularly after a safe space was established. The safe space was crucial for open discussions, and our WhatsApp group enabled continual communication, support and shared decision-making. The resulting co-produced topic guide, coding framework, thematic map, papers and presentations demonstrated significant impact. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first qualitative mental health study to be co-produced using the principles of co-production. Our rigorous assessment can be utilized as an informative document to help others to produce meaningful co-produced future research. Although co-production takes time, it makes significant impact to the research, researchers and co-researchers. Flexible funding for spontaneous suggestions from co-researchers and more time for interview training is recommended
General partnership · Medical education · Mental health · Perception · Political science · Psychiatry · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Thematic analysis · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Psychology
The Many Faces of Engagement
When academic impact is not enough
Co-Creation of a School-Based Motor Competence and Mental Health Intervention
Developing a Theory-Informed Smartphone App for Early Psychosis
A Qualitative Study Exploring Access to Mental Health and Substance Use Support among Individuals Experiencing Homelessness during Covid-19
“A sense of community.” A qualitative descriptive study on how to build relationships and rapport with people with lived/living experience and caregivers engaged in mental health and substance use health research
Elevating lived experience in overdose prevention
A collective autoethnography of coproduction in mental health research by academic researchers and young people in Brazil
‘After a long period of being in hibernation – These little green shoots were growing’. Lived experiences of effective support for autistic young people who have experienced extended school nonattendance
Enhancing benefits for peer researchers
The practice of participatory action research
‘It's Powerful’ The impact of involving children and young people in developing paediatric research agendas
Working With People With Experience of Psychosis to Co‐Design an Educational and Anti‐Stigma Psychosis Intervention for Schools
An Application of Evidence‐Based Approaches to Engage Young People in the Design of a Global Mental Health Databank
Collaborating With Young People
Co‐production to understand online help‐seeking for young people experiencing emotional abuse and neglect
Exploring the impact of engagement in mental health and substance use research
Youth engagement in mental health research
Adapting Experience‐Based Co‐Design to Disability Research
Public involvement in chronic respiratory diseases research
What Do We Know About Sharing Power in Co‐Production in Mental Health Research? A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis
A Parallel Space of Care
Learnings from co-production of an evaluation instrument in an Australian sport for positive youth development program
Shared and Supported Decision Making in Medication in a Mental Health Setting
Moving From Co-Design to Co-Research
A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement on Service Users, Researchers and Communities
The dark side of coproduction
The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care
GRIPP2 reporting checklists
From tokenism to empowerment
Lost in the shadows
Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research
The potential for coproduction to add value to research
Patient and Public Involvement in the Coproduction of Knowledge
| Obras citantes distintas | 25 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 4,17 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 23 |