Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

On the suitability of fast and frugal heuristics for designing values clarification methods in patient decision aids

A critical analysis

Dados Bibliográficos

ID19507553
AutoresArwen H Pieterse (0000-0001-6395-0052, Leiden University), Marieke De Vries (0000-0003-2845-8956, Leiden University)
Ano2013
Volume16
Fascículo3
Páginase73-9
Data de publicação2013-09-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00720.x
PMID21902770
OpenAlexW1596659197
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas2
Referências citadas48

Background Increasingly, patient decision aids and values clarification methods (VCMs) are being developed to support patients in making preference‐sensitive health‐care decisions. Many VCMs encourage extensive deliberation about options, without solid theoretical or empirical evidence showing that deliberation is advantageous. Research suggests that simple, fast and frugal heuristic decision strategies sometimes result in better judgments and decisions. Durand et al. have developed two fast and frugal heuristic‐based VCMs. Objective To critically analyse the suitability of the ‘take the best’ (TTB) and ‘tallying’ fast and frugal heuristics in the context of patient decision making. Strategy Analysis of the structural similarities between the environments in which the TTB and tallying heuristics have been proven successful and the context of patient decision making and of the potential of these heuristic decision processes to support patient decision making. Conclusion The specific nature of patient preference‐sensitive decision making does not seem to resemble environments in which the TTB and tallying heuristics have proven successful. Encouraging patients to consider less rather than more relevant information potentially even deteriorates their values clarification process. Values clarification methods promoting the use of more intuitive decision strategies may sometimes be more effective. Nevertheless, we strongly recommend further theoretical thinking about the expected value of such heuristics and of other more intuitive decision strategies in this context, as well as empirical assessments of the mechanisms by which inducing such decision strategies may impact the quality and outcome of values clarification

Decision aids · Decision analysis · Decision support system · Deliberation · Economics · Heuristic · Heuristics · Management science · Preference · Computer Science · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Mathematics · Medicine · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • Does a decision aid for prostate cancer affect different aspects of decisional regret, assessed with new regret scales? A randomized, controlled trial

    Open Access•Julia J van Tol‐Geerdink, Jan Willem H Leer et al.•Health Expectations•2016

  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions in the emergency department

    Open Access•Stephen P Brummell, Julie Seymour et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2016

  • Process tracing methods

    Open Access•J Kevin Ford, Neal Schmitt et al.•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1989

  • Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions

    Dawn Stacey, France Légaré et al.•Cochrane Database of Systematic…•2017

  • Reasoning the fast and frugal way

    Gerd Gigerenzer, Daniel G Goldstein•Psychological Review•1996

  • On Making the Right Choice

    Open Access•Ap Dijksterhuis, Maarten W Bos et al.•Science•2006

  • SSL

    Jörg Rieskamp, Philipp E Otto•Journal of Experimental…•2006

  • Homo Heuristicus

    Open Access•Gerd Gigerenzer, Henry Brighton•Topics in Cognitive Science•2009

  • The Functions of Affect in Health Communications and in the Construction of Health Preferences

    Open Access•Ellen Peters, Isaac Lipkus et al.•Journal of Communication•2006

  • Deliberation before determination

    Open Access•Glyn Elwyn, Talya Miron‐Shatz•Health Expectations•2010

  • Design and usability of heuristic‐based deliberation tools for women facing amniocentesis

    Open Access•Marie‐Anne Durand, Odette Wegwarth et al.•Health Expectations•2012

  • Information and decision support needs of parents considering amniocentesis

    Open Access•Marie‐Anne Durand, Mareike Stiel et al.•Health Expectations•2010

  • Treatment decision aids

    Open Access•Cathy Charles, Amiram Gafni et al.•Health Expectations•2005

  • Value elicitation

    Baruch Fischhoff•American Psychologist•1991

  • The Effect of Decision Strategy on Deciding to Defer Choice

    Open Access•Ravi Dhar•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•1996

  • Ignorance or integration

    Open Access•Shahar Ayal, Guy Hochman•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2009

  • The transience of constructed preferences

    Open Access•Dan Simon, Daniel C Krawczyk et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2007

  • Think Different

    Ap Dijksterhuis•Journal of Personality and Social…•2004

  • Thinking too much

    Timothy D Wilson, Jonathan W Schooler•Journal of Personality and Social…•1991

  • The construction of preference

    Paul Slovic•American Psychologist•1995

  • Theory-informed design of values clarification methods

    Open Access•Arwen H Pieterse, Marieke De Vries et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2013

  • The Influence of Involvement on Disaggregate Attribute Choice Models

    Dennis H Gensch, Rajshekhar G Javalgi•Journal of Consumer Research•1987

Obras citantes distintas2
Citações por ano0,2
Intervalo de citações2016 - 2016 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae