On the suitability of fast and frugal heuristics for designing values clarification methods in patient decision aids
A critical analysis
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 19507553 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Arwen H Pieterse (0000-0001-6395-0052, Leiden University), Marieke De Vries (0000-0003-2845-8956, Leiden University) |
| Ano | 2013 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | e73-9 |
| Data de publicação | 2013-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Health Expectations (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00720.x |
| PMID | 21902770 |
| OpenAlex | W1596659197 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 48 |
Background Increasingly, patient decision aids and values clarification methods (VCMs) are being developed to support patients in making preference‐sensitive health‐care decisions. Many VCMs encourage extensive deliberation about options, without solid theoretical or empirical evidence showing that deliberation is advantageous. Research suggests that simple, fast and frugal heuristic decision strategies sometimes result in better judgments and decisions. Durand et al. have developed two fast and frugal heuristic‐based VCMs. Objective To critically analyse the suitability of the ‘take the best’ (TTB) and ‘tallying’ fast and frugal heuristics in the context of patient decision making. Strategy Analysis of the structural similarities between the environments in which the TTB and tallying heuristics have been proven successful and the context of patient decision making and of the potential of these heuristic decision processes to support patient decision making. Conclusion The specific nature of patient preference‐sensitive decision making does not seem to resemble environments in which the TTB and tallying heuristics have proven successful. Encouraging patients to consider less rather than more relevant information potentially even deteriorates their values clarification process. Values clarification methods promoting the use of more intuitive decision strategies may sometimes be more effective. Nevertheless, we strongly recommend further theoretical thinking about the expected value of such heuristics and of other more intuitive decision strategies in this context, as well as empirical assessments of the mechanisms by which inducing such decision strategies may impact the quality and outcome of values clarification
Decision aids · Decision analysis · Decision support system · Deliberation · Economics · Heuristic · Heuristics · Management science · Preference · Computer Science · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Mathematics · Medicine · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Process tracing methods
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
Reasoning the fast and frugal way
On Making the Right Choice
SSL
Homo Heuristicus
The Functions of Affect in Health Communications and in the Construction of Health Preferences
Deliberation before determination
Design and usability of heuristic‐based deliberation tools for women facing amniocentesis
Information and decision support needs of parents considering amniocentesis
Treatment decision aids
Value elicitation
The Effect of Decision Strategy on Deciding to Defer Choice
Ignorance or integration
The transience of constructed preferences
Think Different
Thinking too much
The construction of preference
Theory-informed design of values clarification methods
The Influence of Involvement on Disaggregate Attribute Choice Models
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2016 - 2016 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |