Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

The impact of a physician’s recommendation and gender on informed decision making

A randomized controlled study in a simulated decision situation

Dados Bibliográficos

ID19508360
AutoresAnna Lea Meinhardt (Knowledge Construction Lab Leibniz‐Institut fuer Wissensmedien Tuebingen Germany), Anna Meinhardt (0000-0003-3723-6781, Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien), Marie Eggeling (0000-0001-9749-7321, Knowledge Construction Lab Leibniz‐Institut fuer Wissensmedien Tuebingen Germany, autor correspondente), Ulrike Cre (0000-0002-8996-8303, Knowledge Construction Lab Leibniz‐Institut fuer Wissensmedien Tuebingen Germany), Joachim Kimmerle (0000-0002-6345-9498, Knowledge Construction Lab Leibniz‐Institut fuer Wissensmedien Tuebingen Germany), Martina Bientzle (0000-0002-1312-4032, Knowledge Construction Lab Leibniz‐Institut fuer Wissensmedien Tuebingen Germany)
Ano2021
Volume24
Fascículo2
Páginas269-281
Data de publicação2021-04-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.13161
PMID33274816
OpenAlexW3109395096
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas2
Referências citadas46

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the influence of physicians' recommendations and gender on the decision-making process in a preference-sensitive situation. METHODS: N = 201 participants were put in a hypothetical scenario in which they suffered from a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). They received general information on two equally successful treatment options for this injury (surgery vs physiotherapy) and answered questions regarding their treatment preference, certainty and satisfaction regarding their decision and attitude towards the treatment options. Then, participants watched a video that differed regarding physician's recommendation (surgery vs physiotherapy) and physician's gender (female vs male voice and picture). Afterwards, they indicated again their treatment preference, certainty, satisfaction and attitude, as well as the physician's professional and social competence. RESULTS: Participants changed their treatment preferences in the direction of the physician's recommendation (P < .001). Decision certainty (P < .001) and satisfaction (P < .001) increased more strongly if the physician's recommendation was congruent with the participant's prior attitude than if the recommendation was contrary to the participant's prior attitude. Finally, participants' attitudes towards the recommended treatment became more positive (surgery recommendation: P < .001; physiotherapy recommendation: P < .001). We found no influence of the physician's gender on participants' decisions, attitudes, or competence assessments. CONCLUSION: This research indicates that physicians should be careful with recommendations when aiming for shared decisions, as they might influence patients even if the patients have been made aware that they should take their personal preferences into account. This could be particularly problematic if the recommendation is not in line with the patient's preferences

Certainty · Family medicine · MEDLINE · Patient participation · Patient satisfaction · Physical therapy · Preference · Clinical Psychology · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Medicine · Nursing · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making

    Open Access•Simone Korger, Marie Eggeling et al.•Health Expectations•2021

  • The Role of the Information Source in Debunking Health Myths Using the Truth Sandwich Format

    Open Access•Rebecca Blase, Simone Dohle•Health Communication•2026

  • Trust in the Medical Profession

    Open Access•Mark A Hall, Fabian Camacho et al.•Health Services Research•2002

  • Shared decision making

    Open Access•Anne M Stiggelbout, Arwen H Pieterse et al.•Patient Education and Counseling•2015

  • Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions

    Dawn Stacey, France Légaré et al.•Cochrane Database of Systematic…•2017

  • Systematic Review of the Effects of Shared Decision-Making on Patient Satisfaction, Treatment Adherence and Health Status

    Open Access•E A G Joosten, L DeFuentes-Merillas et al.•Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics•2008

  • Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale

    Open Access•Annette M O’Connor, Annette M O'Connor•Medical Decision Making•1995

  • Where Is the Evidence? A Systematic Review of Shared Decision Making and Patient Outcomes

    Open Access•L Aubree Shay, Jennifer Elston Lafata•Medical Decision Making•2015

  • Patient preferences for shared decisions

    Open Access•Betty Chewning, Carma L Bylund et al.•Patient Education and Counseling•2012

  • Non-normal data

    Open Access•Maria J Blanca, María Blanca et al.•Psicothema•2017

  • Is It Really Robust?

    Open Access•Emanuel Schmider, Matthias Ziegler et al.•Methodology•2010

  • Shared Decision Making — The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered Care

    Michael J Barry, Susan Edgman-Levitan et al.•New England Journal of Medicine•2012

  • Physician Gender Effects in Medical Communication

    Debra L Roter, Debra Roter et al.•JAMA•2002

  • A measure of informed choice

    Open Access•Theresa M Marteau, Elizabeth Dormandy et al.•Health Expectations•2001

  • Do physicians’ recommendations pull patients away from their preferred treatment options

    Open Access•Rosmarie Mendel, Eva Traut‐mattausch et al.•Health Expectations•2012

  • Communicating uncertainty can lead to less decision satisfaction

    Open Access•Mary C Politi, Melissa A Clark et al.•Health Expectations•2011

  • The impact of physicians' communication styles on evaluation of physicians and information processing

    Open Access•Martina Bientzle, Tim Fissler et al.•Health Expectations•2017

  • Patients' Satisfaction With Male Versus Female Physicians

    Judith A Hall, Danielle Blanch‐hartigan et al.•Medical Care•2011

  • How perceptions of a simulated physician-patient interaction influence intended satisfaction and compliance

    Open Access•Pamela Willson, J Regis Mcnamara•Social Science & Medicine•1982

Obras citantes distintas2
Citações por ano0,4
Intervalo de citações2021 - 2026 (6)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae