Defining and measuring patient‐centred care
An example from a mixed‐methods systematic review of the stroke literature
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 19508733 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Maggie Lawrence (0000-0002-1685-4639), Sue Kinn |
| Ano | 2012 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 295-326 |
| Data de publicação | 2012-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Health Expectations (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00683.x |
| PMID | 21624025 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 9 |
| Referências citadas | 50 |
Background Involving patients in the determination of their care is increasingly important, and health‐care professionals worldwide have recognized a need for clinical outcome measures and interventions that facilitate patient‐centred care delivery in a range of settings. Aim A mixed‐methods review was conducted, which aimed to identify stroke‐specific patient‐centred outcome measures and patient‐centred interventions. Search strategy Databases searched included MEDLINE and PsycINFO; search strings were based on MeSH terms and keywords associated with the terms ‘stroke’ and ‘patient‐centred’. Data extraction and analysis Descriptive statistics were used to report quantitative data; thematic analysis was also performed in the included studies. Main Results Three patient‐centred outcome measures (Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcomes, Stroke Impact Scale, Communication Outcome after Stroke scale) and four interventions were identified. Key elements of intervention design included delivery in people’s own homes, involvement of families and tailoring to individual needs and priorities. Thematic analysis enabled description of three broad themes: meaningfulness and relevance, quality, and communication, which informed the development of a definition of patient‐centred care specific to the specialty of stroke. Conclusions It is important for health‐care professionals to ensure that their practice is relevant to patients and families. The review identified three stroke‐specific patient‐centred outcome measures, key elements of patient‐centred interventions, and informed the development of a definition of patient‐centred care. These review‐derived outputs represent a useful starting point for health‐care professionals, whatever their specialty, who are working to reconcile tensions between priorities of health‐care professionals and those of patients and their families, to ensure delivery of patient‐centred care
An Integrative Model of Patient-Centeredness – A Systematic Review and Concept Analysis
The empirical evidence underpinning the concept and practice of person-centred care for serious illness
Balancing Good Medicine and Good Communication
How to Improve Integrated Care for People with Chronic Conditions
Ethnic inequalities in doctor-patient communication regarding personal care plans
Who said dialogue conversations are easy? The communication between communication vulnerable people and health‐care professionals
How to practice person‐centred care
Introducing this issue
Development of a patient‐centred, patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM) for post‐stroke cognitive rehabilitation
Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions
Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care
Risk management after stroke
How is patient‐centred care understood by the clinical, managerial and lay stakeholders responsible for promoting this agenda
The Families In Recovery From Stroke Trial (FIRST)
Patient-centredness
Psychosocial intervention in stroke
Evaluating meta-ethnography
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,64 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2012 - 2026 (15) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 9 |