Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Access to Treatment in Hiv Prevention Trials

Perspectives From a South African Community

Dados Bibliográficos

ID19516549
AutoresNicola Barsdorf (0000-0001-6406-8352, University of Bergen, autor correspondente), Suzanne Maman (0000-0003-4048-1585), Norman Ka (0000-0003-3833-8456, Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics), Nancy Kass, C Slack (0000-0002-6608-0248, University of KwaZulu-Natal)
Ano2010
Volume10
Fascículo2
Páginas78-87
Data de publicação2010-08-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoDeveloping World Bioethics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1471-8731 • E-ISSN: 1471-8847
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1471-8847.2009.00265.x
PMID19793135
PMCIDPMC2891264
OpenAlexW2171338500
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas3
Referências citadas1

Access to treatment, in HIV vaccine trials (HVTs), remains ethically controversial. In most prevention trials, including in South Africa, participants who seroconvert are referred to publicly funded programmes for treatment. This strategy is problematic when there is inadequate and uneven access to public sector antiretroviral therapy (ART) and support resources. The responsibilities, if any, of researchers, sponsors and public health authorities involved in HVTs has been hotly debated among academics, scholars, representatives of international organizations and sponsors. However, there is little published on community perceptions. Recent guidance asserts that communities should make inputs into treatment and care decisions. This qualitative study explored a South African community's perceptions of who should provide what to HVT participants as well as how and why this should be done. Twenty‐nine adults working at or attending five primary health care clinics in two rural areas in KwaZulu‐Natal participated in in‐depth interviews. Respondents expressed that researchers should ‘help participants to access’ treatment and care ‘because they are in a position to do so’ and ‘are in a relationship with’ trial participants. Respondents suggested that researchers could help by ‘facilitating referral’ until such time that participants can access care and treatment on their own. We highlight a series of implications for researchers in HVTs, including their need to be aware of prospective participants' considerable trust in and respect for researchers, the responsibility that this places on them, and the need for clear communication with communities so as not to erode community trust

Clinical trial · Family medicine · Health care · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Qualitative research · Referral · Sociology · Ethics in Clinical Research · HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

  • Engaging Diverse Social and Cultural Worlds

    Open Access•Olga Zvonareva, Nora Engel et al.•Developing World Bioethics•2015

  • Reservations on the Use of New HIV Prevention Technologies in HIV Prevention in Sub-Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Calvin Gwandure, Thokozile Mayekiso•Journal of Human Ecology•2012

  • Clean Blood, Religion, and Moral Triage in Tuberculosis Vaccine Trials

    Justin Dixon, Michèle Tameris•Medical Anthropology•2018

  • Interventions to Improve Research Participants' Understanding in Informed Consent for Research

    James Flory, Ezekiel J Emanuel et al.•JAMA•2004

Obras citantes distintas3
Citações por ano0,21
Intervalo de citações2012 - 2018 (7)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae