Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Effective implementation of the UNCRPD by Thailand State Party

Challenges and potential remedies

Dados Bibliográficos

ID19517151
AutoresDonruedee Srisuppaphon (0000-0002-8518-9759, Ministry of Public Health, autor correspondente), Arnon Sriboonroj (Thaksin University), Wachara Riewpaiboon (0000-0001-5748-2758, Health Systems Research Institute), Viroj Tangcharoensathien (0000-0003-3235-0091, Ministry of Public Health)
Ano2017
Volume17
Fascículo1
Páginas15-15
Data de publicação2017-12-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoBMC International Health and Human Rights (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1472-698X • E-ISSN: 1472-698X
EditoraSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1186/s12914-017-0123-5
PMID28545526
OpenAlexW2619315612
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas5

BACKGROUND: The Thai government ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) in 2008, and the first progress report by the State Party was issued in 2012. This study assesses and identifies gaps in the Government's implementation of the Convention. METHODS: Using the Deming Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle as an analytical framework for continuous quality improvement, we reviewed five documents which are: the 2012 State Party report; the list of issues by the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; the 2015 replies to the list of issues by the Thai government; an alternative report produced by Civil Society Organizations (CSOs); and an alternative report produced by the National Human Rights Commission of Thailand. Content analysis is applied to generate the emerging gaps in implementation. RESULTS: Thailand's main advantage is the evolving legal frameworks operating in compliance with the convention, although further amendment is still needed, including effective law enforcement. Conflicting information between the Government's and alternative reports reflects the shortcomings in the information system that intends to support rigorous monitoring and evaluation. Lacking of concrete measures and outcome indicators on certain articles reflects the State Party's limited understanding of the concept of human rights and participatory approaches and insufficient institutional capacities for effective implementation. CONCLUSIONS: To rectify these implementation gaps, a few actions are suggested. This includes amending the laws which violate the rights of persons with psychosocial disability; reforming governance where the monitoring bodies are truly independent from implementing agencies; strengthening cross-sectoral actions; and improving information systems which facilitate monitoring and evaluation where Disabled People's Organizations and Civil Society Organizations are recognized as true equal partners. Implementation research can provide evidence for further effective implementation

Business · Civil society · Commission · Convention · Corporate governance · Enforcement · Good governance · Human rights · Political science · Politics · Disability Rights and Representation · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Human Rights and Development · Law · Public Administration

  • Assessing disability rights in four Asian countries

    Open Access•Y C Chou, Toshiyuki Uwano et al.•Political Geography•2024

  • The Handbook of Political Sociology

    Open Access•Thomas Janoski, Robert R Alford et al.•Handbook of Political Sociology•2003

  • Pity and pragmatism

    Bhensri Naemiratch, L Manderson•Disability & Society•2009

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano0,5
Intervalo de citações2024 - 2024 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae