Enhancing the Impact of Family Justice Centers via Motivational Interviewing
An Integrated Review
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 19521663 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Catherine A Simmons (University of Memphis, autor correspondente), Kathryn H Howell (0000-0001-5213-8691, University of Memphis), Michael Duke (0000-0003-4874-6410, University of Memphis), Michael R Duke, J Gayle Beck (0000-0001-6044-3426, University of Memphis) |
| Ano | 2016 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 532-541 |
| Data de publicação | 2016-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Trauma Violence & Abuse (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1524-8380 • E-ISSN: 1552-8324 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1524838015585312 |
| PMID | 25966969 |
| OpenAlex | W2277774731 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 9 |
| Referências citadas | 25 |
The Family Justice Center (FJC) model is an approach to assisting survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) that focuses on integration of services under one roof and co-location of staff members from a range of multidisciplinary agencies. Even though the FJC model is touted as a best practice strategy to help IPV survivors, empirical support for the effectiveness of this approach is scarce. The current article consolidates this small yet promising body of empirically based literature in a clinically focused review. Findings point to the importance of integrating additional resources into the FJC model to engage IPV survivors who have ambivalent feelings about whether to accept help, leave the abusive relationship, and/or participate in criminal justice processes to hold the offender accountable. One such resource, motivational interviewing (MI), holds promise in aiding IPV survivors with these decisions, but empirical investigation into how MI can be incorporated into the FJC model has yet to be published. This article, therefore, also integrates the body of literature supporting the FJC model with the body of literature supporting MI with IPV survivors. Implications for practice, policy, and research are incorporated throughout this review
Ambivalence · Criminal justice · Criminology · Domestic violence · Economic Justice · Feeling · Medical emergency · Motivational interviewing · Multidisciplinary approach · Poison control · Political science · Psychological intervention · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Child Abuse and Trauma · Computer Science · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Social Psychology
Whose Fault Is It?” How Rural Chinese Women Explain Intimate Partner Violence
Contrer la violence domestique faite aux femmes au Brésil par l’intervention interdisciplinaire et socioéducative
The community-level impact of a family justice center
Victims’ experiences and satisfaction with a family justice center
Professionals’ perceptions of the impact of a family justice center
Courting Justice
Professional Representations of Collaboration in the Response to Intimate Partner Violence
Systematic Review of Research on Co-Location Models for Serving Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survivors
Principaux univers de sens de l’intervention sociojudiciaire en violence conjugale
Motivational Interviewing
The efficacy of motivational interviewing
Costs of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in the United States
What is Motivational Interviewing?
Motivating Women With Substance Abuse and Intimate Partner Violence
Reducing HIV and Partner Violence Risk Among Women with Criminal Justice System Involvement
Motivational Interviewing at the Intersections of Depression and Intimate Partner Violence among African American Women
Immigrant and Nonimmigrant Women
From the Voices of Women
Family justice centres
A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Help-Seeking Processes Among Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence
Challenging the Pursuit of Criminalisation in an Era of Mass Incarceration
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,29 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2019 - 2023 (5) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 9 |