Strengthening expertise for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa

BACKGROUND: Achieving sustainable universal health coverage depends partly on fair priority-setting processes that ensure countries spend scarce resources wisely. While general health economics capacity-strengthening initiatives exist in Africa, less attention has been paid to developing the capacity of individuals, institutions and networks to apply economic evaluation in support of health technology assessment and effective priority-setting. OBJECTIVE: On the basis of international lessons, to identify how research organisations and partnerships could contribute to capacity strengthening for health technology assessment and priority-setting in Africa. METHODS: A rapid scan was conducted of international formal and grey literature and lessons extracted from the deliberations of two international and regional workshops relating to capacity-building for health technology assessment. 'Capacity' was defined in broad terms, including a conducive political environment, strong public institutional capacity to drive priority-setting, effective networking between experts, strong research organisations and skilled researchers. RESULTS: Effective priority-setting requires more than high quality economic research. Researchers have to engage with an array of stakeholders, network closely other research organisations, build partnerships with different levels of government and train the future generation of researchers and policy-makers. In low- and middle-income countries where there are seldom government units or agencies dedicated to health technology assessment, they also have to support the development of an effective priority-setting process that is sensitive to societal and government needs and priorities. CONCLUSIONS: Research organisations have an important role to play in contributing to the development of health technology assessment and priority-setting capacity. In Africa, where there are resource and capacity challenges, effective partnerships between local and international researchers, and with key government stakeholders, can leverage existing skills and knowledge to generate a critical mass of individuals and institutions. These would help to meet the priority-setting needs of African countries and contribute to sustainable universal health coverage

Business · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental planning · Geography · Political science · Public economics · Global Maternal and Child Health · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Medicine · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy

• A New eHealth Investment Appraisal Framework for Africa

  Open Access•Sean Broomhead, Maurice Mars et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  Incluir item

• Assessing the potential of HTA to inform resource allocation decisions in low-income settings

  Open Access•Francesco Ramponi, Pakwanja Twea et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  Incluir item

• Health technology assessment and priority setting for universal health coverage

  Open Access•Benjamin Uzochukwu, Chinyere Cecilia Okeke et al.•Globalization and Health•2020

  Incluir item

• Building capacity for public and population health research in Africa

  Open Access•Alex Ezeh, Alex C Ezeh et al.•Global Health Action•2010

  Incluir item