The Relationship Between Ambivalent and Indifferent Pregnancy Desires and Contraceptive Use Among Malawian Women

Dados Bibliográficos

ID19544934
AutoresSarah Huber (0000-0002-2574-0158, The Ohio State University), Huber Huber, Allahna Esber (0000-0001-5337-0126, Henry M. Jackson Foundation), Esber Esber, Sarah Garver (0000-0001-9850-4685, The Ohio State University), Garver Garver, Venson Banda (Legacy International), Banda Banda, Alison Holt Norris (0000-0002-1864-9583, The Ohio State University), Norris Norris
Ano2017
Volume43
Fascículo1
Páginas13
Data de publicação2017-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoInternational Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1944-0391 • E-ISSN: 1944-0405
EditoraGuttmacher Institute (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1363/43e3417
PMID28930624
OpenAlexW2725073235
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas14

CONTEXT: Pregnancy ambivalence and pregnancy indifference are thought to be associated with nonuse of contraceptives, but their conceptualization and measurement vary, and their relationship to contraceptive use in developing countries is poorly understood. METHODS: Data from the Umoyo wa Thanzi research program in rural Lilongwe, Malawi, were used to classify the pregnancy desires of 592 women aged 15-39 as antinatal, pronatal, ambivalent or indifferent, according to both the women's desire to conceive and their desire to avoid pregnancy. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between each of the four pregnancy desire categories and use of modern contraceptives. RESULTS: Overall, 12% of women were classified as ambivalent, 32% as indifferent, 44% as antinatal and 12% as pronatal. In the logistic regression analysis, the odds of contraceptive use among women with indifferent pregnancy desires (having both a desire not to avoid pregnancy and a desire not to conceive) were twice those of women with pronatal desires (odds ratio, 2.2) and were similar to those among women with antinatal desires (2.7). In contrast, the odds of contraceptive use among women with ambivalent pregnancy desires (having both a desire to avoid pregnancy and a desire to conceive) did not differ from those of women who had pronatal desires. CONCLUSIONS: Ambivalent and indifferent pregnancy desires are common in Malawi and are associated with modern contraceptive use in different ways. Understanding the complex nature of pregnancy desires may be valuable in improving family planning programs

Ambivalence · Developmental psychology · Family planning · Fertility · Gynecology · Logistic regression · Odds · Odds ratio · Population · Pregnancy · Research methodology · Sociology · Demography · Global Maternal and Child Health · Male Reproductive Health Studies · Medicine · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Social Psychology