Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Pastoralist views and positions on coexistence with large carnivores. An overview from conflict areas across Europe

Dados Bibliográficos

ID19583283
AutoresValéria Salvatori (0000-0002-9613-7479, Istituto di Sessuologia Clinica, autor correspondente), Estelle Balian (Département Sciences pour l’Action et le Développement), Katrina Marsden (0000-0002-3611-2878, Adelphi Research), Juliette Young (0000-0002-8522-0883, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement)
Ano2026
Volume8
Fascículo7
Páginas2200-2211
Data de publicação2026-05-28
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPeople and Nature (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2575-8314 • E-ISSN: 2575-8314
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/pan3.70359
OpenAlexW7162642478
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas72

While large carnivore expansion is a conservation success, it increasingly challenges pastoralism. Beyond economic value, pastoralism provides critical biodiversity and sociocultural benefits, recognized by the UN and the EU's ‘High Nature Value farming’ designation. However, carnivore impacts threaten the motivation of pastoralists to continue, risking these multidimensional benefits. We interviewed 27 pastoralists across seven European high‐conflict areas (Spain, Italy, Romania, France, Sweden and Finland) to assess their experiences, stakeholder relationships and future outlooks. Most interviewees reported increased attacks over the last 5 years, attributed to population growth driven by reintroductions, natural recolonization under protection or insufficient management (e.g. lack of hunting). Although aware of prevention measures, perceptions of efficacy vary: fences are preferred in Spain and Italy, while livestock guarding dogs are primary in France. Institutional support for these tools is consistently deemed insufficient. Two thirds of respondents demand urgent action, reporting psychological distress and abandonment. Over half—particularly in Southern Europe—threaten to cease activities without management reforms. Proposed solutions include population reduction and relaxed protection status. Increasing carnivore populations threaten the economic and cultural viability of pastoralism. This pressure is most acute in Southern Europe, compounded by market and climate shifts. This study highlights the urgency of integrating traditional land use with modern conservation, calling for greater recognition of predator–human impacts and collaborative, institutionally supported solution spaces. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog

Biodiversity · Carnivore · Livestock · Natural resource · Pastoralism · Population · Population growth · Sociocultural evolution · Stakeholder · Ecology and biodiversity studies · Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation

  • Sharing landscapes with wildlife

    Open Access•Katrina Marsden, Hanna Pettersson et al.•People and Nature•2026

  • The role of trust in the resolution of conservation conflicts

    Open Access•Juliette Young, Juliette C Young et al.•Biological Conservation•2016

  • Conservation’s blind spot

    Open Access•Francine Madden, Brian Mcquinn•Biological Conservation•2014

  • Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes

    Open Access•Guillaume Chapron, Petra Kaczensky et al.•Science•2014

  • Understanding and managing conservation conflicts

    Open Access•Steve M Redpath, Juliette Young et al.•Trends in Ecology & Evolution•2013

  • Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation

    Open Access•Eleanor J Sterling, Erin Betley et al.•Biological Conservation•2017

  • Conflict transformation in indigenous peoples’ territories

    Open Access•Iokiñe Rodríguez, Mirna Inturias et al.•Development Studies Research•2018

  • Rethinking the study of human–wildlife coexistence

    Open Access•Siân Pooley, Saloni Bhatia et al.•Conservation Biology•2021

  • A methodological guide to using and reporting on interviews in conservation science research

    Open Access•Juliette Young, David Christian Rose et al.•Methods in Ecology and Evolution•2018

  • Stakeholder participation for environmental management

    Open Access•Myer S Reed, Mark S Reed•Biological Conservation•2008

  • The importance of understanding the multiple dimensions of power in stakeholder participation for effective biodiversity conservation

    Open Access•L Lécuyer, Estelle Balian et al.•People and Nature•2024

  • Who is local and what do they know? Braiding knowledges within carnivore management in Europe

    Open Access•Hanna Pettersson, L Lécuyer et al.•People and Nature•2025

  • Meeting at the crossroads

    Open Access•Alex McInturff, Clare E B Cannon et al.•Elementa Science of the…•2021

  • Human-carnivore relations

    Open Access•Mónica Expósito-Granados, Mónica Expósito‐Granados et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2019

  • Creating social value by empowering people

    Open Access•Nadia Von Jacobi, Enrica Chiappero-Martinetti et al.•Annals of Public and Cooperative…•2023

  • Beyond compensation

    Open Access•Abishek Harihar, Diogo Veríssimo et al.•Global Environmental Change•2015

  • The impact of wolves on psychological distress among farmers in Norway

    Open Access•Alexander Zahl‐thanem, Rob J F Burton et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2020

  • Social representations of the wolf

    Open Access•Helene Figari, Ketil Skogen•Acta Sociologica•2011

  • Environmentality

    Arun Agrawal•Current Anthropology•2005

Citações por ano1
Intervalo de citações2026 - 2026 (1)
Altamente citadoNão
Abrir DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae