Pastoralist views and positions on coexistence with large carnivores. An overview from conflict areas across Europe
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 19583283 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Valéria Salvatori (0000-0002-9613-7479, Istituto di Sessuologia Clinica, autor correspondente), Estelle Balian (Département Sciences pour l’Action et le Développement), Katrina Marsden (0000-0002-3611-2878, Adelphi Research), Juliette Young (0000-0002-8522-0883, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement) |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Fascículo | 7 |
| Páginas | 2200-2211 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-05-28 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | People and Nature (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2575-8314 • E-ISSN: 2575-8314 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/pan3.70359 |
| OpenAlex | W7162642478 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 72 |
While large carnivore expansion is a conservation success, it increasingly challenges pastoralism. Beyond economic value, pastoralism provides critical biodiversity and sociocultural benefits, recognized by the UN and the EU's ‘High Nature Value farming’ designation. However, carnivore impacts threaten the motivation of pastoralists to continue, risking these multidimensional benefits. We interviewed 27 pastoralists across seven European high‐conflict areas (Spain, Italy, Romania, France, Sweden and Finland) to assess their experiences, stakeholder relationships and future outlooks. Most interviewees reported increased attacks over the last 5 years, attributed to population growth driven by reintroductions, natural recolonization under protection or insufficient management (e.g. lack of hunting). Although aware of prevention measures, perceptions of efficacy vary: fences are preferred in Spain and Italy, while livestock guarding dogs are primary in France. Institutional support for these tools is consistently deemed insufficient. Two thirds of respondents demand urgent action, reporting psychological distress and abandonment. Over half—particularly in Southern Europe—threaten to cease activities without management reforms. Proposed solutions include population reduction and relaxed protection status. Increasing carnivore populations threaten the economic and cultural viability of pastoralism. This pressure is most acute in Southern Europe, compounded by market and climate shifts. This study highlights the urgency of integrating traditional land use with modern conservation, calling for greater recognition of predator–human impacts and collaborative, institutionally supported solution spaces. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog
Biodiversity · Carnivore · Livestock · Natural resource · Pastoralism · Population · Population growth · Sociocultural evolution · Stakeholder · Ecology and biodiversity studies · Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
The role of trust in the resolution of conservation conflicts
Conservation’s blind spot
Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes
Understanding and managing conservation conflicts
Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation
Conflict transformation in indigenous peoples’ territories
Rethinking the study of human–wildlife coexistence
A methodological guide to using and reporting on interviews in conservation science research
Stakeholder participation for environmental management
The importance of understanding the multiple dimensions of power in stakeholder participation for effective biodiversity conservation
Who is local and what do they know? Braiding knowledges within carnivore management in Europe
Meeting at the crossroads
Human-carnivore relations
Creating social value by empowering people
Beyond compensation
The impact of wolves on psychological distress among farmers in Norway
Social representations of the wolf
Environmentality
| Citações por ano | 1 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Altamente citado | Não |