Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Comparative performance of multiple-list estimators of key population size

Dados Bibliográficos

ID19590803
AutoresSteve Gutreuter (0000-0002-0733-2900, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, autor correspondente)
EditoresMark C Wheldon (0000-0002-6897-9644)
Ano2022
Volume2
Fascículo3
Páginase0000155
Data de publicação2022-03-10
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPLOS Global Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2767-3375 • E-ISSN: 2767-3375
EditoraPublic Library of Science (PLoS) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1371/journal.pgph.0000155
PMID35928219
OpenAlexW4220807265
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas44

Estimates of the sizes of key populations (KPs) affected by HIV, including men who have sex with men, female sex workers and people who inject drugs, are required for targeting epidemic control efforts where they are most needed. Unfortunately, different estimators often produce discrepant results, and an objective basis for choice is lacking. This simulation study provides the first comparison of information-theoretic selection of loglinear models (LLM-AIC), Bayesian model averaging of loglinear models (LLM-BMA) and Bayesian nonparametric latent-class modeling (BLCM) for estimation of population size from multiple lists. Four hundred random samples from populations of size 1,000, 10,000 and 20,000, each including five encounter opportunities, were independently simulated using each of 30 data-generating models obtained from combinations of six patterns of variation in encounter probabilities and five expected per-list encounter probabilities, producing a total of 36,000 samples. Population size was estimated for each combination of sample and sequentially cumulative sets of 2–5 lists using LLM-AIC, LLM-BMA and BLCM. LLM-BMA and BLCM were quite robust and performed comparably in terms of root mean-squared error and bias, and outperformed LLM-AIC. All estimation methods produced uncertainty intervals which failed to achieve the nominal coverage, but LLM-BMA, as implemented in the dga R package produced the best balance of accuracy and interval coverage. The results also indicate that two-list estimation is unnecessarily vulnerable, and it is better to estimate the sizes of KPs based on at least three lists

Bayesian probability · Confidence interval · Coverage probability · Econometrics · Estimation · Estimator · Linear model · Log-linear model · Population · Sample size determination · Small area estimation · Statistics · Census and Population Estimation · Data-Driven Disease Surveillance · Demography · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk · Mathematics

  • Model Selection and Multimodel Inference

    Open Access•Fred S Guthery, Kenneth P Burnham et al.•Journal of Wildlife Management•2003

  • Estimating the Population Size of Female Sex Worker Population in Tehran, Iran

    Open Access•Manoochehr Karami, Salman Khazaei et al.•AIDS and Behavior•2017

  • Estimating the Size of the MSM Population in Metro Vancouver, Canada, Using Multiple Methods and Diverse Data Sources

    Open Access•Ashleigh J Rich, Nathan Lachowsky et al.•Journal of Urban Health•2017

  • Population Size Estimation of Men Who Have Sex with Men in Ho Chi Minh City and Nghe An Using Social App Multiplier Method

    Open Access•Ali Safarnejad, Nguyen Thien Nga et al.•Journal of Urban Health•2017

  • Homosexuality and bisexuality in different populations

    Open Access•Milton Diamond•Archives of Sexual Behavior•1993

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae