Funders
The missing link in equitable global health research
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 19590905 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Esmita Charani (0000-0002-5938-1202, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, autor correspondente), Seye Abimbola (0000-0003-1294-3850, The University of Sydney), Madhukar Pai (0000-0003-3667-4536, McGill University), Olusoji Adeyi (0000-0003-1072-9383, Johns Hopkins University), Marc Mendelson (0000-0001-6668-3893, University of Cape Town), Ramanan Laxminarayan (0000-0002-1390-9016, Princeton University), Muneera A Rasheed (0000-0002-9064-0102, autor correspondente) |
| Editores | Deisy De Freitas Lima Ventura |
| Ano | 2022 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | e0000583 |
| Data de publicação | 2022-06-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | PLOS Global Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2767-3375 • E-ISSN: 2767-3375 |
| Editora | Public Library of Science (PLoS) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000583 |
| PMID | 36962429 |
| OpenAlex | W4282016954 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 42 |
| Referências citadas | 28 |
Global health research is mired by inequities, some of which are linked to current approaches to research funding. The role of funders and donors in achieving greater equity in global health research needs to be clearly defined. Imbalances of power and resources between high income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is such that many funding approaches do not centre the role of LMIC researchers in shaping global health research priorities and agenda. Relative to need, there is also disparity in financial investment by LMIC governments in health research. These imbalances put at a disadvantage LMIC health professionals and researchers who are at forefront of global health practice. Whilst many LMICs do not have the means (due to geopolitical, historical, and economic reasons) for direct investment, if those with means were to invest more of their own funds in health research, it may help LMICs become more self-sufficient and shift some of the power imbalances. Funders and donors in HICs should address inequities in their approach to research funding and proactively identify mechanisms that assure greater equity–including via direct funding to LMIC researchers and direct funding to build local LMIC-based, led, and run knowledge infrastructures. To collectively shape a new approach to global health research funding, it is essential that funders and donors are part of the conversation. This article provides a way to bring funders and donors into the conversation on equity in global health research
Computer network · Environmental health · Political science · Computer Science · Global Health and Surgery · Global Maternal and Child Health · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Medicine
Shifting power in global health research
Building Bridges
Nurturing transformative participation
Positive deviance/hearth intervention in collaboration between academia and NGOs
Quantifying the attributable burden of economic inequality on under-five mortality across ten African countries
Equitable imagery in global health
Equitable global health research collaborations with a mind of human dignity
Is global health truly global? A hashtag analysis of #GlobalHealth disparities on X
Rewriting the byline
The duration of intervals on the oral cancer care pathway and implications for survival
Aligning the principles and practice of research integrity and research fairness in global health
Bibliometric analysis of sub-Saharan African and US authorship in publications about sub-Saharan Africa funded by the Fogarty International Center, 2008–2020
Mapping inequities in global vaccine sentiment research
Transforming partnerships through transboundary research
Research capacity and decolonisation in Sub-Saharan Africa
Mentorship as an overlooked dimension of research capacity strengthening
Identifying and assessing the capacity and experience of trial sites in low- and middle-income countries for high-quality randomised drug trials in maternal and perinatal health
The richness of urban health realities lost in measurement monocultures
Understanding global health research collaborations
Low-research settings
Exploring equity in global health collaborations
Challenges facing Arab researchers in conducting and publishing scientific research
Why has the United States of America not ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child? The veto fulcrum as a new health policy analysis framework
Under-representation of low and middle income countries (LMIC) in the research literature
Solidarity and its decoloniality in global health ethics
Potential of citizen science to advance urban planetary health research in low and middle-income countries
Decolonising global health research
A multi-step analysis and co-produced principles to support equitable partnership with Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, 125 years on
Soft money, hard power
The Implementation of Early Intervention Initiatives for Psychosis in Latin America and the Caribbean
Strengthening diagnostic capacity in Africa as a key pillar of public health and pandemic preparedness
Who is a global health expert
The Female Global Scholars Program
Towards authentic institutional allyship by global health funders
Striving towards true equity in global health
Implementation research can enhance health research systems and reduce dependency on external aid
Establishing best practices guidelines for collaborative research in global surgery
Embedding research capacity strengthening in multi-country studies in low-and middle-income countries
The Role of Research Funders in Promoting Ethical International Health Research Collaborations
Repenser la santé mondiale depuis la perspective des penseurs décoloniaux originaires d’Afrique francophone
Towards a coherent global health architecture
Whose child is it? A psychological perspective on responsibility and accountability in decision making on nurturing care in early childhood
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's grant-making programme for global health
Epistemic injustice in academic global health
Will global health survive its decolonisation?
Stuck in the middle
Addressing power asymmetries in global health
Towards a common definition of global health
Using scientific authorship criteria as a tool for equitable inclusion in global health research
How to identify epistemic injustice in global health research funding practices
The implicit ideological function of the global health field and its role in maintaining relations of power
Country ownership in global health
Toward an ethics of global health (de)funding
Innovation alone won't end Covid-19
| Obras citantes distintas | 42 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 10,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 39 |