A rapid qualitative methods assessment and reporting tool for epidemic response as the outcome of a rapid review and expert consultation
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 19593787 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Dong Dong (0000-0001-9784-6472, Chinese University of Hong Kong, autor correspondente), Sharon Abramowitz (0000-0003-3671-8842, Georgetown University, autor correspondente), Gustavo Correa Matta (0000-0002-5422-2798, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, autor correspondente), Arlinda B Moreno (0000-0002-8282-6521, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, autor correspondente), Elysee Nouvet (0000-0002-1607-3453, Western University, autor correspondente), Jeni Stolow (0000-0001-8926-1861, Tulane University, autor correspondente), Caitlin Pilbeam (0000-0001-7247-7674, Australian National University, autor correspondente), Shelley Susan Lee (0000-0003-0062-7930, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, autor correspondente), Shelley Lees, EK Yeoh (Chinese University of Hong Kong, autor correspondente), Nina H Gobat (0000-0002-1558-557X, World Health Organization, autor correspondente), Nina Gobat, Tamara Giles-Vernick (0000-0003-2873-8544, Institut Pasteur, autor correspondente) |
| Editores | Sanjana J Ravi |
| Ano | 2023 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Fascículo | 10 |
| Páginas | e0002320 |
| Data de publicação | 2023-10-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | PLOS Global Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2767-3375 • E-ISSN: 2767-3375 |
| Editora | Public Library of Science (PLoS) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002320 |
| PMID | 37889886 |
| OpenAlex | W4387976703 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 45 |
During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Methods Sub-Group of the WHO COVID-19 Social Science Research Roadmap Working Group conducted a rapid evidence review of rapid qualitative methods (RQMs) used during epidemics. The rapid review objectives were to (1) synthesize the development, implementation, and uses of RQMs, including the data collection tools, research questions, research capacities, analytical approaches, and strategies used to speed up data collection and analysis in their specific epidemic and institutional contexts; and (2) propose a tool for assessing and reporting RQMs in epidemics emergencies. The rapid review covered published RQMs used in articles and unpublished reports produced between 2015 and 2021 in five languages (English, Mandarin, French, Portuguese, and Spanish). We searched multiple databases in these five languages between December 2020 and January 31, 2021. Sources employing “rapid” (under 6 months from conception to reporting of results) qualitative methods for research related to epidemic emergencies were included. We included 126 published and unpublished sources, which were reviewed, coded, and classified by the research team. Intercoder reliability was found to be acceptable (Krippendorff’s α = 0.709). We employed thematic analysis to identify categories characterizing RQMs in epidemic emergencies. The review protocol was registered at PROSPERO (no. CRD42020223283) and Research Registry (no. reviewregistry1044). We developed an assessment and reporting tool of 13 criteria in three domains, to document RQMs used in response to epidemic emergencies. These include I. Design and Development (i. time frame, ii. Training, iii. Applicability to other populations, iv. Applicability to low resource settings, v. community engagement, vi. Available resources, vii. Ethical approvals, viii. Vulnerability, ix. Tool selection); II. Data Collection and Analysis (x. concurrent data collection and analysis, xi. Targeted populations and recruitment procedures); III. Restitution and Dissemination ( xii. Restitution and dissemination of findings, xiii. Impact). Our rapid review and evaluation found a wide range of feasible and highly effective tools, analytical approaches and timely operational insights and recommendations during epidemic emergencies
Alternative medicine · Data collection · Family medicine · Medical education · Pathology · Qualitative research · Research design · Thematic analysis · COVID-19 and Mental Health · Disaster Response and Management · Medicine · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
The experiences of health-care providers during the Covid-19 crisis in China
Content Analysis
Public perceptions and experiences of social distancing and social isolation during the Covid-19 pandemic
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (Coreq)
What questions we should be asking about Covid-19 in humanitarian settings
La radio cubana ante la Covid-19. Un estudio de caso
População em situação de rua e Covid-19
Rapid Ethnographies
Rapid Ethnographic Assessments
Integrating the social sciences in epidemic preparedness and response
Experiences and psychosocial problems of nurses caring for patients diagnosed with Covid-19 in Turkey
Community Perspectives on Contraception in the Context of the Zika Virus in the U.S. Virgin Islands
Medidas de distanciamento social no controle da pandemia de Covid-19
Humaniser » les soins dans l’épidémie d’Ebola ? Les tensions dans la gestion du care et de la biosécurité dans le suivi des sujets contacts au Sénégal
Hygiene programming during outbreaks
A Rapid Qualitative Assessment of the Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on a Racially/Ethnically Diverse Sample of Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men who Have Sex with Men Living with HIV in the US South
Rapid qualitative research methods during complex health emergencies
A qualitative analysis of social scientists' opinions on socioeconomic and demographic implications of the lockdown during Covid ‐19 in India
The Role of Community Advisory Boards
Experiencias, barreras y facilitadores en la implementación de intervenciones de control del Aedes aegypti en América Latina y Caribe
Dinâmica familiar de criança com a síndrome congênita do Zika vírus no Município de Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brasil
Carrying Out Rapid Qualitative Research During a Pandemic
An ethnographic exploration of diarrheal disease management in public hospitals in Bangladesh
Saúde Global E Direitos Humanos
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |