Ctrl + Z
The Right to Be Forgotten
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 20007993 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Meg Leta Jones (autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2016 |
| Data de publicação | 2016-12-31 |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | BOOK |
| Periódico | Ctrl + Z (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Editora | New York University Press (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.18574/nyu/9781479898718.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W4393267320 |
| ISBN | 9781479898718 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 22 |
A gripping insight into the digital debate over data ownership, permanence and policy “This is going on your permanent record!” is a threat that has never held more weight than it does in the Internet Age, when information lasts indefinitely. The ability to make good on that threat is as democratized as posting a Tweet or making blog. Data about us is created, shared, collected, analyzed, and processed at an overwhelming scale. The damage caused can be severe, affecting relationships, employment, academic success, and any number of other opportunities—and it can also be long lasting. One possible solution to this threat? A digital right to be forgotten, which would in turn create a legal duty to delete, hide, or anonymize information at the request of another user. The highly controversial right has been criticized as a repugnant affront to principles of expression and access, as unworkable as a technical measure, and as effective as trying to put the cat back in the bag. Ctrl+Z breaks down the debate and provides guidance for a way forward. It argues that the existing perspectives are too limited, offering easy forgetting or none at all. By looking at new theories of privacy and organizing the many potential applications of the right, law and technology scholar Meg Leta Jones offers a set of nuanced choices. To help us choose, she provides a digital information life cycle, reflects on particular legal cultures, and analyzes international interoperability. In the end, the right to be forgotten can be innovative, liberating, and globally viable
Computer Science · Freedom of Expression and Defamation · Law, Rights, and Freedoms · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Introducing Vigilant Audiences
Retooling Politics
Reputation Anxiety
Challenging the Carceral Imaginary in a Digital Age
El derecho al olvido
Curadoria digital urbana, rebelião monumental e a disrupção das narrativas patrimoniais em tempos de isolamento
Erasing the Past
A Friendly Critique of Levinasian Machine Ethics
The Right to Be Forgotten and the Value of an Open Future
The Limits of Memory and the News
Old Wine in a New Bottle
Are All (Neo‐)Victorians Murderers? Serials, Killers and Other Historicidal Maniacs
This is NOT human services’
Frances Burney and protective self-erasure in early nineteenth-century Britain
The right to a human in the loop
Contesting the Vulgar Hanmai Performance from Kuaishou
‘Make them famous’
From Making Automated Decision Making Visible to Mapping the Unknowable Human
The normative significance of future moral revolutions
Infancy Online
Mummy Blogs and Representations of Motherhood
Critical data studies
| Obras citantes distintas | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2,2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2016 - 2026 (11) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 22 |