Typologies of Scepticism in the Philosophical Tradition of Kalām
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 20142299 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Abdurrahman Ali Mihirig (0000-0002-7892-4719, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2022 |
| Volume | 88 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 13-48 |
| Data de publicação | 2022-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Theoria (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0040-5825 • E-ISSN: 1755-2567 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/theo.12270 |
| OpenAlex | W3114823645 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 15 |
This article examines the role of scepticism in the Islamic philosophical tradition. It begins with a treatment of the origins and purpose of these discussions in classical kalām ( c . 800–1100 CE). Then it moves on to the more mature discussions treating five forms of scepticism in the post‐classical period ( c .1200–1800 CE), with the aim of demonstrating how they construed scepticism, the arguments for and against it, and what purposes scepticism played in their system. Three of these types of scepticism are unrestricted, meaning that their denial of knowledge is universal. The other two types are restricted to a denial of inferential knowledge, either entirely, or in certain subjects such as metaphysics and natural philosophy. The discussion will focus on two of the most widely studied works of kalām: Saʿd al‐Din al‐Taftāzānī's Sharḥ al‐ʿAqāʾid al‐Nasafiyya and Jalāl al‐Dīn al‐Dawānī's Sharḥ al‐ʿAqāʾid al‐ʿAḍudiyya , including some of their super‐commentaries
Denial · Epistemology · Focus (optics) · Meaning (existential) · Metaphysics · Physics · Psychoanalysis · Skepticism · Education and Islamic Studies · Islamic Studies and History · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy · Psychology
What do philosophers believe?
Islamic Intellectual History in the Seventeenth Century
Al-Māturīdī and the Development of Sunnī Theology in Samarqand
From Al-Ghazālī to Al-Rāzī
One Aspect of the Avicennian Turn in Sunnī Theology
Does a Proposition Have Three Parts or Four? A Debate in Later Arabic Logic
The Nature and Scope of Arabic Philosophical Commentary in Post-Classical (Ca. 1100–1900 Ad) Islamic Intellectual History
Warriors of the Cloisters. The Central Asian Origins of Science in the Medieval World
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |