On Successful Communication, Intentions and False Beliefs

I discuss a criterion for successful communication between a speaker and a hearer put forward by Buchanan according to which there is communicative success only if the hearer entertains, as a result of interpreting the speaker’s utterance, a thought that has the same truth conditions as the thought asserted by the speaker and, furthermore, does so in virtue of recognizing the speaker’s communicative intentions. I argue, against Buchanan, that the data on which it is based are compatible with a view involving Fregean modes of presentation. In the second part of the article I critically discuss Unnsteinsson’s claim that communicative success depends on the absence of contextually salient false distinctness beliefs about the subject matter of the conversation. I argue that this thesis leads to clearly counterintuitive consequences and that no fundamental role must be given to the presence or absence of false distinctness beliefs in one’s account of successful communication. The upshot is that we should stick with Buchanan’s criterion. I conclude by employing Strawson and Recanati’s concepts of linking and merging to show how the criterion I favour is compatible with the fact that, when subjects hold no relevant false distinctness beliefs, communicative success does not seem to be disrupted by the hearer seemingly failing to recognize the speaker’s intentions

Conversation · Counterintuitive · Epistemology · Linguistics · Presentation (obstetrics) · Salient · Utterance · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology · Social Psychology

• Asymmetries between 'you' and 'I'

  Open Access•Matheus Valente•THEORIA An International Journal…•2025

  Incluir item

• Referential Understanding, Luck, and Knowledge of Reference

  Open Access•Victor Tamburini•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2025

  Incluir item

• A formal approach to reanalysis and the Early Semantic Stability Hypothesis

  Open Access•Elitzur A Bar-Asher Siegal•Linguistics•2025

  Incluir item

• Linguistic communication and speech acts

  Kent Bach•Linguistic communication and…•1979

  Incluir item

• Subject and Predicate in Logic and Grammar

  R H Stoothoff, Robert Stoothoff et al.•The Philosophical Quarterly•1976

  Incluir item