Why estimates of the peat burned in fires in Sumatra and Kalimantan are unreliable and why it matters
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 20153337 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Timothy C Jessup (Global Green Growth Institute Jakarta Indonesia), Timothy Jessup, Andrew P Vayda (Independent Scholar New York NY USA), Mark A Cochrane (0000-0002-4573-568X, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science Frostburg MD USA), Grahame Applegate (0000-0002-8167-0318, University of the Sunshine Coast Sippy Downs Queensland Australia, autor correspondente), Kevin C Ryan (FireTree Wildland Fire Sciences Missoula MT USA), Bambang Hero Saharjo (0000-0003-4348-8483, Faculty of Forestry Bogor Agricultural University Bogor Indonesia) |
| Ano | 2022 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 7-25 |
| Data de publicação | 2022-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0129-7619 • E-ISSN: 1467-9493 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/sjtg.12406 |
| OpenAlex | W4200141327 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 49 |
Most recent estimates of carbon emissions from Indonesia's peatland fires are based on extrapolation from a narrow base of empirical evidence, raising concerns about the reliability of fire emissions estimates. Measurements of peat fires during ENSO periods are not representative of fires in other years, yet they underlie many estimates of peat fire emissions in ‘normal’ years. Errors may enter into estimates of area burned, quantity of peat combusted and fire emission factors. Problems arise in extrapolating from a few empirical measurements without accounting for conditions that influence combustibility of peat and the heavy fuels through which surface fires transition to become peat fires. These conditions are influenced by drainage and fire history. Our analysis is based on a critical look at a sample of peat fire and emissions studies, including the two most widely cited ones, as well as at the uses made of those studies. Undue extrapolation from unrepresentative empirical studies contributes significantly to the uncertainty of emissions estimates in studies that rely on models rather than empirical observation. We do not offer our own estimates; rather, we argue that the base of evidence must be broadened. We point to examples of empirically based research that more reliably show the contribution of peat fires to overall peatland carbon emissions
Climatology · Extrapolation · Geography · Greenhouse gas · Peat · Physical geography · Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics · Environmental Science · Fire effects on ecosystems · Geology · Mathematics · Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
The Stratigraphy and Fire History of the Kutai Peatlands, Kalimantan, Indonesia
Current and future CO 2 emissions from drained peatlands in Southeast Asia
Global vulnerability of peatlands to fire and carbon loss
Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997–2009)
Committed carbon emissions, deforestation, and community land conversion from oil palm plantation expansion in West Kalimantan, Indonesia
Communicating uncertainty about facts, numbers and science
Fire science for rainforests
The amount of carbon released from peat and forest fires in Indonesia during 1997
Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt
Beyond slash‐and‐burn
From carbon sink to carbon source
Assessing existing peatland models for their applicability for modelling greenhouse gas emissions from tropical peat soils
Sources of anthropogenic fire ignitions on the peat-swamp landscape in Kalimantan, Indonesia
Land for the People
Causal Explanation of Indonesian Forest Fires
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |