Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Exploring the core questions of African science

An in-depth transformative journey in search of direction

Dados Bibliográficos

ID20157993
AutoresMaxwell Omaboe (0009-0006-2773-2326, University of Cape Coast, autor correspondente), Husein Inusah (0000-0002-5715-8832, University of Cape Coast), Eromosele Eric Usifoh (University of Cape Coast)
Ano2026
Páginas1-17
Data de publicação2026-05-22
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoSouth African Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0258-0136 • E-ISSN: 2073-4867
EditoraInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02580136.2026.2636391
OpenAlexW7162114930
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas36

The question of African science interrogates the possibility of devising an African- oriented methodology for scientific theorising. Apologias of African science propose at least three evidential rationales in defence of a scientific method claimed to be African – namely, (i) utility, (ii) uniqueness and (iii) secrecy. These three justifications enact theories of African science according to the article’s proposal of three major methodological perspectives – namely, (i) a functionalist perspective, (ii) a metaphysico-religious perspective and (iii) a critical-rationalist perspective. In an effort to explore the credentials of the discipline, scholars, by and large, have neglected a detailed analysis of the worth of the justifications that sustain African science. Consequently, the neglect has blurred an opportunity to appreciate the various ways in which the methodological justifications in themselves hand African science a spade to dig its own grave of stagnation. In this work, we take a holistic approach to enrich the discourse by examining the supposed justifications along with the methodological perspectives. Using the method of concept analysis, we establish that the sole focus on the much-exalted virtues used in justifying the legitimacy of African science inhibits growth by subtly echoing competition rather than complementarity. As such, consideration for growth should redirect the discipline to look beyond the interests of such justifications in pursuit of complementarity

Transformative learning · African cultural and philosophical studies · Families in Therapy and Culture · Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Agriculture

  • A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism

    Open Access•Anjan Chakravartty•Metaphysics for Scientific Realism•2007

  • Representing and Intervening

    Open Access•Ian Hacking•Representing and Intervening•1983

  • Knowledge Cultures

    Bert Hamminga•Knowledge Culture•2005

  • Medicine Across Cultures

    Open Access•Helaine Selin•Medicine across cultures•2003

  • Is African science true science? Reflections on the methods of African science

    Oseni Taiwo Afisi•Filosofia Theoretica Journal of…•2016

  • Demystifying the African world view – mainstream science to the rescue

    Maxwell Omaboe•South African Journal of Philosophy•2024

  • Is Science Multicultural

    Sandra G Harding, Sandra Harding•Configurations•1994

  • Muthi, Medicine and Witchcraft

    Adam Ashforth•Social Dynamics•2005

  • Witchcraft among the Ibibio of Nigeria

    Daniel A Offiong•African Studies Review•1983

  • Traditional Healers in the Nigerian Health Care Delivery System and the Debate over Integrating Traditional and Scientific Medicine

    Daniel A Offiong•Anthropological Quarterly•1999

  • African Traditional Thought and Western Science

    Open Access•Robin Horton•Africa•1967

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae