Further Thoughts on Guide to Personal Knowledge
Response to Our Reviewers
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 20195477 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Daniel Paksi (0000-0003-0961-9590), Mihály Héder (0000-0002-9979-9101), The Polanyi Society |
| Ano | 2023 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 25-31 |
| Data de publicação | 2023-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Tradition and Discovery The Polanyi Society Periodical (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1057-1027 • E-ISSN: 2154-1566 |
| Editora | Philosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.5840/traddisc202349213 |
| OpenAlex | W4382721520 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 2 |
The two Hungarian authors of Guide to Personal Knowledge are in general agreement with the assessments of their work offered by David Alker and Alessio Tartaro. However, they contend that Jon Fennell’s criticism of their writing style, while sometimes accurate, nevertheless derives from an expected level of precision from non-native speakers of English that is unnecessary when the language is used as a lingua franca. Moreover, they suggest that underlying Fennell’s complaints about language are differences in the interpretation of Polanyi’s philosophy
Criticism · Epistemology · Lingua franca · Linguistics · Literature · Political science · Sociology · Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Law · Philosophy · Psychology
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |