“My Whole Life I’ve Been a Fraud”

The themes of paralyzing, solipsistic self-critique versus the necessarily communal character of authentic, meaningful existence in the work of American novelist David Foster Wallace are best understood in light of existentialism. This article compares Wallace’s story “Good Old Neon” with Albert Camus’s novella The Fall, as responses to similar unproductive tendencies within the respective postmodernist and Marxist discourses of their times. Both works portray an absolutist self-critique that produces feelings of (inauthentic) fraudulence and exceptionality; and both include an interlocutor that ultimately makes the reader the direct addressee of the text. In doing so, “Good Old Neon” and The Fall confront the reader with the moral task of resisting excessive (self-)critique and reaffirming authentic, meaningful existence as always arising in connection to others

Aesthetics · Art · Epistemology · Existentialism · Feeling · Literature · Marxist philosophy · Novella · Political science · Politics · Psychoanalysis · Self · Sociology · Contemporary Literature and Criticism · Law · Modernist Literature and Criticism · Philosophy · Psychology · Short Stories in Global Literature

• The Cambridge Companion to David Foster Wallace

  Open Access•Ralph Clare•Cambridge Companion to David…•2018

  Incluir item

• A Companion to David Foster Wallace Studies

  Open Access•Marshall Boswell, Stephen J Burn•Companion to David Foster Wallace…•2013

  Incluir item

• Camus and the Fall from Innocence

  Carl A Viggiani•Yale French Studies•1960

  Incluir item