“Torn Between Two Lovers”

Feminist biblical criticism of Proverbs 1–9 has decried the figure of “Dame Folly” as reinforcing pejorative stereotypes of women that blame women for “the world’s sin and corruption.” To be sure, in the history of Christian biblical interpretation, Proverbs has been read in precisely this way—and with tragic consequences. In fact, Proverbs was used as fuel for the witch-hunting craze that infected the Christian West in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, with its particular focus on women as being especially “addicted” to heresy and “evil superstitions.” Nonetheless, as this essay demonstrates, a reading which denigrates all women universally as blameworthy is not really native to post-exilic Judaism or biblical literature in general before the Hellenistic period. Instead, it emerges with the influence of Hellenism and the misogynist stereotypes endemic to Greek literature, mythology, and even philosophy that distort and blur the lens through which Hellenistic Jews (and later Greco-Roman Christians) read their Scriptures. Through a reading of Proverbs in its own language, its own post-exilic Jewish world, and its own literary context, this essay both recovers the wise women of Israel, so esteemed and valued in post-exilic Judaism, and uncovers the identity of the real fool of Proverbs 9

Blame · Criticism · Hebrew Bible · Heresy · Judaism · Pejorative · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Classical Antiquity Studies · Historical and Linguistic Studies

• Women Writers of Ancient Greece and Rome

  Ian Plant•Women Writers of Ancient Greece…•2004

  Incluir item

• Eve and Pandora Contrasted

  Open Access•William E Phipps•Theology Today•1988

  Incluir item

• Sexuality and gender in the classical world

  Laura Mcclure, Laura K McClure•Sexuality and Gender in the…•2002

  Incluir item

• Rediscovering Eve

  Carol Meyers, Carol L Meyers•Rediscovering Eve•2012

  Incluir item