The Person–Case Constraint and the Inverse Agreement Constraint are manifestations of the same Inverse Topicality Constraint

Dados Bibliográficos

ID20344138
AutoresKatalin E Ki (0000-0003-2054-4593, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, autor correspondente), Katalin É Kiss
Ano2017
Volume34
Fascículo2
Páginas365-395
Data de publicação2017-10-26
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoThe Linguistic Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0167-6318 • E-ISSN: 1613-3676
EditoraWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/tlr-2017-0004
OpenAlexW2760914333
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas17

This paper first claims that the Inverse Agreement Constraint and the Person–Case Constraint attested in overlapping sets of Uralic languages are manifestations of the same Inverse Topicality Constraint, requiring that the structural hierarchy of topicalized constituents correspond to the ranking of their referents in the Animacy/Topicality Hierarchy. Then it argues that it is the hypothesized Inverse Topicality Constraint that also underlies the Person– Case Constraints restricting the cooccurrence of clitics in ditransitive and ergative–absolutive constructions across languages. It is shown that alternative analyses of the Person–Case Constraint, e.g., those deriving it from the mechanism of multiple Agree, cannot account for the whole range of data attested

Animacy · Hierarchy · Inverse · Linguistics · Optimality theory · Phonology · Political science · Computer Science · Law · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Linguistics and language evolution · Mathematics · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence