There might be more to syntactic bootstrapping than being pragmatic

In ‘Being pragmatic about syntactic bootstrapping’, Hacquard (2022) argues that abstract syntax is useful for word learning, but that an additional cue, pragmatics, is both necessary and available for young children during the first steps of language acquisition. She focuses on modals and attitude verbs, where the physical context seems particularly impoverished as the sole basis for deriving meanings, and thus where linguistic cues may be particularly helpful. She convincingly shows how pragmatic and syntactic cues could be combined to help young language learners learn and infer the possible meanings of attitude verbs such as “think”, “know” or “want”. She also argues that, in some circumstances, syntax and pragmatics would need to be supplemented by semantic information from context – for instance, in the case of modals such as “might”, “can”, or “must”. We agree with Hacquard on the importance of the synergies between these different cues to meaning, and wish to add two other aspects of the input that might also be used by young children in these contexts. The aspects we describe can only be noticed when one analyzes concrete examples of what children hear in their everyday lives, something which Hacquard does very often in her work (e.g., Dieuleveut, van Dooren, Cournane & Hacquard, 2022; Huang, White, Liao, Hacquard & Lidz, 2022; Yang, 2022). Taking into account different cues for meaning would help the field go beyond current models of syntactic bootstrapping, and create an integrated picture of the synergies between different levels of linguistic information

Language acquisition · Linguistics · Pragmatics · Prosody · Syntax · Language Development and Disorders · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

• Learning modal force

  Open Access•Anouk Dieuleveut, Ira Noveck•Language Acquisition•2026

  Incluir item

• Prosodic Typology II

  Sun-Ah Jun•Prosodic Typology II•2014

  Incluir item

• Intonational Phonology

  Open Access•D Robert Ladd•Intonational Phonology•2008

  Incluir item

• Intentions in Communication

  Jerry L Morgan, Philip R Cohen et al.•Intentions in Communication•2019

  Incluir item

• The Meaning of Intonational Contours in the Interpretation of Discourse

  Janet B Pierrehumbert, Janet Pierrehumbert et al.•Intentions in Communication•1990

  Incluir item

• Learning to predict and predicting to learn

  Mireille Babineau, Naomi Havron et al.•Language Acquisition•2023

  Incluir item

• Syntactic bootstrapping attitude verbs despite impoverished morphosyntax

  Nick Huang, Aaron Steven White et al.•Language Acquisition•2022

  Incluir item

• Turkish children use morphosyntactic bootstrapping in interpreting verb meaning

  Open Access•Tilbe Göksun, Aylin C Küntay et al.•Journal of Child Language•2008

  Incluir item

• Being pragmatic about syntactic bootstrapping

  Open Access•Valentine Hacquard•Journal of Child Language•2023

  Incluir item

• Developmental and cognitive aspects of children’s disbelief comprehension through intonation and facial gesture

  Open Access•Meghan E Armstrong, Núria Esteve‐gibert et al.•First Language•2018

  Incluir item

• How Children and Adults Produce and Perceive Uncertainty in Audiovisual Speech

  Open Access•Emiel Krahmer, Marc Swerts•Language and Speech•2005

  Incluir item

• Finding the force

  Open Access•Anouk Dieuleveut, Annemarie Van Dooren et al.•Natural Language Semantics•2022

  Incluir item