Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Seeing is believing

Societal differences in AI awareness and the link to AI-related beliefs

Dados Bibliográficos

ID20398024
AutoresSarah V Bentley (0000-0002-7771-1631, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, autor correspondente), David Evans (0000-0001-7258-3485), David H Evans (0000-0002-9157-4610, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation)
Ano2026
Volume41
Fascículo4
Páginas2863-2876
Data de publicação2026-04-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAI & Society (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0951-5666 • E-ISSN: 1435-5655
EditoraSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s00146-025-02554-w
OpenAlexW4413988363
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas5
Referências citadas64

Today, there is a call for a responsible integration of AI into society. Building transparency and explainability into this integration is key, meaning AI should be understandable to end-users. Given the prevalence of AI in everyday technology, this focus on seeing into the black box misses a more fundamental need, that being an initial awareness of its presence. Using survey data collected from Australian ( $$n=303$$ n = 303 ) and UK ( $$n=301$$ n = 301 ) populations, this study estimates differences in awareness of AI across societal groups, as well as the relationship between AI awareness and beliefs about AI. Results demonstrate significantly lower awareness for traditionally digitally excluded groups, which is exacerbated for intersectional groupings such as those categorised by gender, age, and education. Further, lack of awareness predicts negative beliefs about AI. These findings highlight the importance of calibrating levels of AI visibility according to the needs of different people across society

Art · Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Performing arts · Visual arts · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • Seeing is no longer believing

    Open Access•Elisa Serafinelli•Visual Studies•2026

  • Public awareness, trust, and readiness to adopt AI-driven Wash policies

    Open Access•Dipali Pawar, Rathin Biswas•Water Policy•2026

  • Socioeconomic disparities in AI awareness

    Open Access•Sai Wang, Tianlun Zhou et al.•Information Communication & Society•2026

  • From moral panic to pragmatic governance

    Open Access•Katarzyna Borkowska, David Jackson•AI & Society•2026

  • Attitudes toward AI in health- and non-health-related contexts

    Open Access•Kamilla Boda, Andras Matuz et al.•Acta Psychologica•2026

  • The Network Society

    Manuel Castells•Network Society•2004

  • Connecting the dots in trustworthy Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez, Javier Del Ser et al.•Information Fusion•2023

  • Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Baobao Zhang, Allan Dafoe•SSRN Electronic Journal•2019

  • Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life's domains.

    Edward L Deci, Richard M Ryan•Canadian Psychology/Psychologie…•2008

  • Digital inclusion as a social determinant of health

    Open Access•Cynthia J Sieck, Amy R Sheon et al.•npj Digital Medicine•2021

  • How the ICT development level and usage influence student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science

    Open Access•Maxim Skryabin, Jingjing Zhang et al.•Computers & Education•2015

  • Daily Well-Being

    Open Access•H T Reis, Kennon M Sheldon et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2000

  • The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines

    Open Access•Anna Jobin, Marcello Ienca et al.•Nature Machine Intelligence•2019

  • Public attitudes towards algorithmic personalization and use of personal data online

    Open Access•Anastasia Kozyreva, Philipp Lorenz-Spreen et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2021

  • The political and social contradictions of the human and online environment in the context of artificial intelligence applications

    Open Access•Roman Rakowski, Petra Kowalikova•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Transparency in artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Sofia Larsson, Stefan Larsson et al.•Internet Policy Review•2020

  • Impacts of Attitudes Toward Government and Corporations on Public Trust in Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Yi-Ning Katherine Chen, Chia-Ho Ryan Wen•Communication Studies•2021

  • The importance of the assurance that “humans are still in the decision loop” for public trust in artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Naomi Aoki•Computers in Human Behavior•2021

  • Does digital inclusion affect quality of life? Evidence from Australian household panel data

    Open Access•Mohammad Afshar Ali, Khorshed Alam et al.•Telematics and Informatics•2020

  • Artificial Intelligence and Declined Guilt

    Open Access•Marilyn Giroux, Jungkeun Kim et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2022

  • The digital divide

    Open Access•Sophie Lythreatis, Sanjay Kumar Singh et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2022

  • Unlocking society's standings in artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Anna-Мaria Kanzola, Anna-Maria Kanzola et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2024

  • Between security and convenience

    Open Access•Genia Kostka, Léa Steinacker et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2021

  • Drivers behind the public perception of artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Tan Yigitcanlar, Koray Değirmenci et al.•AI & Society•2024

  • Awareness and perception of artificial intelligence operationalized integration in news media industry and society

    Open Access•Chad S Owsley, Keith Greenwood•AI & Society•2024

  • Digital Sociology

    D Lupton•Digital Sociology•2014

  • Why Aren't Our Digital Solutions Working for Everyone

    Open Access•Brian Van Winkle, Neil Carpenter et al.•The AMA Journal of Ethic•2017

  • An unfinished journey? Reflections on a decade of responsible research and innovation

    Open Access•Roger Owens, Rene Von Schomberg et al.•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2021

  • Trust, awareness, and independence

    Open Access•Binod Prasad Koirala, Yashar Araghi et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2018

  • Internet skills and the digital divide

    Open Access•Alexander J A M Van Deursen, Alexander van Deursen et al.•New Media & Society•2010

  • Artificial intelligence and mass personalization of communication content—An ethical and literacy perspective

    Open Access•Erik Hermann•New Media & Society•2021

  • The outcomes of gaining digital skills for young people’s lives and wellbeing

    Open Access•Sonia Livingstone, Giovanna Mascheroni et al.•New Media & Society•2021

  • An introduction to the information age

    Manuel Castells•City•1997

  • Cognition in context

    Open Access•Sarah V Bentley, Katharine H Greenaway et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2017

  • Measuring trustworthiness is crucial for medical AI tools

    Open Access•Sunanda Kundu, Shinjini Kundu•Nature Human Behaviour•2023

  • Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings

    Open Access•Jan A G M Van Dijk, Jan Van Dijk•Poetics•2006

  • Price and the person

    Liz Moor, Celia Lury•Journal of Cultural Economy•2018

  • Household and Individual Digitisation and Deprivation

    Open Access•Reyes González-Relaño, Angel Luis Lucendo-Monedero et al.•Social Indicators Research•2024

Obras citantes distintas5
Citações por ano5
Intervalo de citações2026 - 2026 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 5
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae