Unfolding Parallel Reasoning in Islamic Jurisprudence

One of the epistemological results emerging from this initial study is that the different forms of co-relational inference , known in the Islamic jurisprudence as qiyās , represent an innovative and sophisticated form of reasoning that not only provides new epistemological insights into legal reasoning in general but also furnishes a fine-grained pattern for parallel reasoning which can be deployed in a wide range of problem-solving contexts and does not seem to reduce to the standard forms of analogical argumentation studied in contemporary philosophy of science. However, in the present paper we will only discuss the case of so-called co-relational inferences of the occasioning factor and only in the context of Islamic jurisprudence

Argumentation theory · Defeasible reasoning · Epistemology · Fiqh · Inference · Islam · Jurisprudence · Political science · Sharia · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Computer Science · History · Law · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy

• Uṣūl al-fiqh et philosophie

  Ziad Bou Akl•Studia Islamica•2022

  Incluir item

• In Existence and in Nonexistence

  Open Access•Shahid Rahman, Walter Edward Young•Méthodos•2022

  Incluir item

• Arsyad Al-Banjari’s Dialectical Model for Integrating Indonesian Traditional Uses into Islamic Law

  Open Access•Muhammad Iqbal, Shahid Rahman•Argumentation•2021

  Incluir item

• The logic of legal reasoning in religious and non-religious cultures

  Wael B Hallaq•Law and Legal Theory in Classical…•2022

  Incluir item

• Propositions as games as types

  Open Access•Aarne Ranta•Synthese•1988

  Incluir item

• Inference versus consequence” revisited

  Open Access•Göran Sundholm•Synthese•2012

  Incluir item

• Dialogical Connexive Logic

  Open Access•Shahid Rahman, Helge Rückert•Synthese•2001

  Incluir item

• What Is Ḣijāb

  Open Access•Mostafa Hashem Sherif•The Muslim World•1987

  Incluir item