Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

How institutional factors at US land-grant universities impact scientists’ public scholarship

Dados Bibliográficos

ID20403136
AutoresLuye Bao (0000-0003-3355-6630), Mikhaila N Calice (0000-0001-5296-6729, University of Wisconsin–Madison), Dominique Brossard (0000-0002-9188-8388, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA; Morgridge Institute for Research, USA, autor correspondente), Becca Beets (0000-0002-3323-1281, University of Wisconsin–Madison), Dietram A Scheufele (0000-0002-9914-5407, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA; Morgridge Institute for Research), Kathleen M Rose (0000-0003-2690-9848, University of Missouri)
Ano2023
Volume32
Fascículo2
Páginas124-142
Data de publicação2023-02-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPublic Understanding of Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0963-6625 • E-ISSN: 1361-6609
EditoraSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/09636625221094413
PMID35652301
OpenAlexW4281733919
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas39

The call for public scholarship to emphasize the broader impacts of science has raised questions about how universities can support this work among their scientists. This study quantitatively assesses how institutional factors shape scientists’ participation in public scholarship, a subset of public engagement focusing on scientists’ involvement in public debate and democratic decision-making related to science policy. Based on a 2018 survey of scientists from 46 US land-grant universities ( N = 6,242), hierarchical linear modeling results show that institutional factors, including tenure guidelines and the extent of government funding, play a minor role in influencing scientists’ public scholarship participation. More importantly, scientists’ perceptions of the university climate on support for engagement, including support from high-level administrators and for graduate students, are significant predictors of participation in public scholarship. Ultimately, these findings support the recommendation that universities should coordinate individual motivations with institutional missions to support a broader culture of public engagement

Civic engagement · Land grant · Political science · Politics · Public engagement · Public relations · Public support · Scholarship · Sociology · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Law · Public Administration · scientometrics and bibliometrics research · Service-Learning and Community Engagement

  • Tug of War or Pulling Together? Comparing Reciprocal Task Role Expectations of Professional Communicators and Scientists in Organizational Science Communication

    Open Access•Lennart Banse, Liliann Fischer et al.•International Journal of…•2025

  • A New Obligation or a Natural Extension? STEM Scientists’ Science Communication in the Context of Their Professional Role Identities

    Open Access•Lennart Banse, Friederike Hendriks et al.•Science Communication•2025

  • Are Productive Scientists More Willing to Engage With the Public

    Open Access•Luye Bao, Mikhaila N Calice et al.•Science Communication•2023

  • A triangulated approach for understanding scientists’ perceptions of public engagement with science

    Open Access•Mikhaila N Calice, Luye Bao et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2023

  • Introduction

    Toss Gascoigne, Bernard Schiele•Communicating Science•2020

  • Hierarchical Linear Modeling

    G David Garson, G Garson•Hierarchical Linear Modeling•2013

  • Scientists’ incentives and attitudes toward public communication

    Open Access•Kathleen M Rose, Ezra M Markowitz et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2020

  • Interactions with the Mass Media

    Open Access•Hans Peter Peters, Dominique Brossard et al.•Science•2008

  • Communicating science in social settings

    Open Access•Dietram A Scheufele•Proceedings of the National…•2013

  • Science communication as political communication

    Open Access•Dietram A Scheufele•Proceedings of the National…•2014

  • Science and the media

    Open Access•P Weingart•Research Policy•1998

  • Scientists and the public understanding of science

    Open Access•Gillian Pearson, Susan M Pringle et al.•Public Understanding of Science•1997

  • Whose AI? How different publics think about AI and its social impacts

    Open Access•Luye Bao, Nicole M Krause et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2022

  • Scientists as public communicators

    Shirley S Ho, Jiemin Looi et al.•Asian Journal of Communication•2020

  • Which indicators for the new public engagement activities? An exploratory study of European research institutions

    Open Access•Federico Neresini, Massimiano Bucchi•Public Understanding of Science•2011

  • Mobilisation for public engagement

    Open Access•Marta Entradas, Martin M Bauer•Public Understanding of Science•2017

  • Predicting scientists’ participation in public life

    Open Access•John C Besley, Sang‐hwa Oh et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2013

  • The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication

    Dan Kahan, Kathleen Hall Jamieson et al.•Oxford Handbook of the Science of…•2017

  • Organizational Factors that Influence University-Based Researchers’ Engagement in Knowledge Transfer Activities

    Open Access•Neil Jacobson, Dale Butterill et al.•Science Communication•2004

  • What Factors Predict Scientists' Intentions to Participate in Public Engagement of Science Activities

    Open Access•Ellen Poliakoff, Thomas L Webb•Science Communication•2007

  • Toward a Model of Scientists’ Public Communication Activity

    Open Access•Anthony Dudo•Science Communication•2012

  • Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

    Neil W Henry, Jacob Cohen et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1977

  • Health News Agenda Building

    Open Access•María E Len-Ríos, María E Len‐río et al.•Journalism & Mass Communication…•2009

  • Assessment by Audiences Shows Little Effect of Science Communication Training

    Open Access•Margaret A Rubega, Kevin R Burgio et al.•Science Communication•2021

  • Organizational Influence on Scientists’ Efforts to Go Public

    Open Access•Frank Marcinkowski, Matthias Kohring et al.•Science Communication•2014

  • Understanding Scientists’ Willingness to Engage

    Open Access•John C Besley, Anthony Dudo et al.•Science Communication•2018

  • Contribution of Training to Scientists’ Public Engagement Intentions

    Open Access•Jacob Copple, Nichole Bennett et al.•Science Communication•2020

Obras citantes distintas4
Citações por ano1,33
Intervalo de citações2023 - 2025 (3)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 4
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae