Methodological aspects of working memory assessment in simultaneous interpreters
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 20506986 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Barbara Köpke (0000-0003-1634-3457, Octogone-Lordat (EA 4156), Université de Toulouse (UTM), France), Teresa M Signorelli (Marymount Manhattan College) |
| Ano | 2012 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 183-197 |
| Data de publicação | 2012-06-01 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Journal of Bilingualism (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1367-0069 • E-ISSN: 1756-6878 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1367006911402981 |
| OpenAlex | W2039114635 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 16 |
| Referências citadas | 26 |
It is commonly assumed that simultaneous interpreting is very demanding with respect to cognitive resources such as working memory (WM). Previous studies measuring WM skills in simultaneous interpreters, however, have yielded contradictory findings. Some studies seem to support the hypothesis of enhanced WM skills in professional interpreters, others do not find differences between interpreters and controls. This article offers an attempt to account for some of these contradictory results with an analysis of methodological aspects and their theoretical implications. Two of the most frequently used experimental paradigms are considered: a free recall task with articulatory suppression (Köpke & Nespoulous, 2006; Padilla, Bajo, & Macizo, 2005; Padilla Benítez, 1995) and reading or listening span (Christoffels, de Groot, & Kroll, 2006; Köpke & Nespoulous, 2006; Liu, Schallert, & Carroll, 2004; Padilla Benítez, 1995). Concerning the free recall task, it is argued that participant selection may account for contradictory findings and that differences in task timing are so pronounced that the different studies may actually assess different memory skills. The discussion of methodological differences in the listening or reading span task leads to the claim that results are consistent with the view of professional interpreters being advantaged in free recall WM tasks but not in serial recall
Active listening · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Free recall · Interpreter · Linguistics · Memory span · Recall · Working memory · Communication · Computer Science · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Neuroscience · Psychology
Multilingualism and the Brain
A Micro-macro Paradigm to Identify Simultaneous Interpreting Strategies (SISs) with Reference to -taxis Relations in UN Discourse
Conference interpreting as extreme language use
Effect of language proficiency and degree of formal training in simultaneous interpreting on working memory and interpreting performance
Working memory in simultaneous interpreters
Multilingualism and Memory
Translation Between L2 Acquisition and L1 Attrition
In search of the working memory advantage in conference interpreting – Training, experience and task effects
The influence of experience on cognitive load during simultaneous interpretation
The construct of cognitive load in interpreting and its measurement
On interpreters’ working memory and executive control
Simultaneous interpreting and working memory executive control
Meta-analysis and replication in interpreting studies
Meta-analyses of simultaneous interpreting and working memory
Into-A or Into-B, That is a Question
Inhibition Efficiency in Highly Proficient Bilinguals and Simultaneous Interpreters
Human Memory
Memory and language skills in simultaneous interpreters
Individual differences in working memory and reading
The serial position effect of free recall.
On the capacity of attention
Reassessing working memory
A capacity theory of comprehension
Attention to Action
Working memory
Levels of processing
Verbal Memory During Simultaneous Interpretation
Working memory and expertise in simultaneous interpreting
Working memory performance in expert and novice interpreters
| Citações por ano | 1,14 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2012 - 2023 (12) |
| Altamente citado | Não |