Language at the Limits of the Human
Deceit, Invention, and the Specter of the Unshared Symbol
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 2109337 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Courtney Handman (0000-0003-0118-1045, The University of Texas at Austin, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2023 |
| Volume | 65 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 726-750 |
| Data de publicação | 2023-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Comparative Studies in Society and History (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0010-4175 • E-ISSN: 1475-2999 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0010417523000221 |
| OpenAlex | W4382560192 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 8 |
| Referências citadas | 39 |
Both the theories coming out of the linguistic turn and those running away from it have placed special emphasis on human language (or human symbolic thinking) as a matter of convention and shared meanings. Yet there are other histories that link language and humanness through invention, deceit, and secrecy rather than through convention and publicness. These alternate models have been used as diagnostic of humanness in a range of contexts, from the colonial past into the technologized present. I examine here the ways in which the unshared, non-public symbol has stood at the center of two disparate contexts in which the humanness of speakers of novel languages are put in question. The first case examines the ways in which Christian missionaries started to see Tok Pisin, a novel pidginized language spoken by indentured laborers in colonial Papua New Guinea, as a possible language of evangelism when it became associated with deceit and moral dissolution. The second case examines a 2017 moral panic in the United States about two chatbots that were reported to have invented their own language and then used it to lie to one another. In contrast to the first case, one of the ways that bots get figured as beyond-human is in the fear that there is no way to impose a moral order, no colonial evangelism that could be used to encompass them. By taking on the symbolic while withholding public meanings, the speakers of these unshared symbols sit at the boundaries of humanness
Colonialism · Evangelism · Linguistics · Political science · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Symbol (formal · The Symbolic · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Gothic Literature and Media Analysis · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Psychology · Law · Philosophy
Toward a phenomenology of mystification
Do chatbots dream of AI sheep? A semantic–pragmatic investigation of "naturalness" in human–AI interaction
From talking tools to metahumans
The algorithm's hidden layers
Voice and agency in Spiritualist mediumship
Language machines
Human tests for machine models
A translated utopia
English as a Global Language
Minds, brains, and programs
The Interpretation of Cultures
Creoles and pidgins
Social lives in language – sociolinguistics and multilingual speech communities
The Common Wind
Glossolalia and the Problem of Language
Androids and Intelligent Networks in Early Modern Literature and Culture
Medieval Robots
Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity
Gender Trouble
The ghost factories
Pidgin and Creole Languages
Lunatic Lovers of Language
The Autonomy of Affect
The Cyber-Homunculus
Artificial language, natural history
Proto-Peasant Revolts? The Late Slave Rebellions in the British West Indies 1816-1832
A Few Grass Huts
Against Creole Exceptionalism
Course in General Linguistics
In Favor of Deceit
Why Is Shame on the Skin
Languages without subjects
Standardization, Racialization, Languagelessness
Can the Avatar Speak
Glossolalia and cacophony in South Korea
The Affectiveness of Symbols
Deleuze and the Anthropology of Becoming
"Cultural" Concepts and the Language-Culture Nexus
Ritual Communication and Linguistic Ideology
The Escalation of Gambling in Papua New Guinea, 1936-1971
| Obras citantes distintas | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 8 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 8 |