Environmental assessment simplification in Botswana – is it fit for purpose
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21153404 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Gorata Kingsley Matome (0000-0002-6513-9041, University of Botswana, autor correspondente), Thomas B Fischer (0000-0003-1436-1221, University of Liverpool) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 267-280 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-05-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1461-5517 • E-ISSN: 1471-5465 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14615517.2024.2363720 |
| OpenAlex | W4399743227 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 49 |
Environmental assessments (EAs) in Botswana are insufficiently influential in decision-making and have been criticised for contributing to extended transaction costs and timelines. Therefore, efforts to simplify EA have been undertaken. Whilst internationally, the value of EA is judged by its capability to raise the profile of environmental issues and enhance public participation in decision processes, current EA simplification interventions in Botswana aim at constraining access to environmental information, at reducing public participation provisions and at restricting the scope of environmental impacts to be evaluated. Ultimately, EA is intended to be replaced with outcome-based tools aiming to mitigate and compensate for environmental damage rather than avoiding it. The authors therefore suggest that simplification efforts in Botswana are bound to erode benefits associated with EA and are not fit for purpose. In this paper, three recommendations are offered: whilst outcome-based tools can be prepared for projects that were assessed by EA they must be firmly tiered to them. Furthermore, discretion in decision-making needs to remain in place, and data sharing should be enhanced by placing EA reports in the public domain
Environmental impact assessment · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Political science · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Environmental Science · Mining and Resource Management
Theories of the Policy Process
Research design
EIA decision-making and administrative justice
Botswana nature-based tourism and Covid-19
Replacing EIA and SEA with Environmental Outcome Reports (EORs) - the 2022 levelling up and regeneration bill in the UK
Is there any EIA simplification
Simplification of environmental assessment – the case of Sweden
Three decades of EIA streamlining
Strategic environmental assessment’s role in formulating environmentally sound development plans in Botswana
From medicine to poison
Environmental impact assessment follow-up
Transformation towards a sustainable world – the pivotal role of impact assessments
Three decades of EIA reforms in India
Lessons for impact assessment from the UK referendum on BREXIT
EA simplification
Simplification of environmental and other impact assessments – results from an international online survey
Environmental impact assessment (EIA) effectiveness in protected areas
Don’t Shoot the Messenger – Reflections on streamlining and simplification of Environmental Assessment in the Netherlands
Stakeholder perspectives and challenges to the institutionalization of strategic environmental assessment in Botswana
In full retreat
Simplification and potential replacement of EA in the UK – is it fit for purpose
Unfolding simplification beyond drawbacks
Environmental assessment simplification in Spain
The future of impact assessment in Austria and Germany – streamlining impact assessment to save the planet
Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment in Germany? – meta-review of SEA research in the light of effectiveness dimensions
Environmental Assessment in the Arctic
From procedural to transformative
Reforming EIA systems
Simplified environmental impact assessment processes
Prospects and Challenges for Tourism Certification in Botswana
Impact assessment
The attractive concept of simplicity in environmental impact assessment
Are current effectiveness criteria fit for purpose? Using a controversial strategic assessment as a test case
Does enhanced regulation improve EIA report quality? Lessons from South Africa
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |