The gig economy, platform work, and social policy
Food delivery workers' occupational welfare dilemma in Hong Kong
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 2116502 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Tat Chor Au‐yeung (0000-0002-2741-855X, autor correspondente), Chris King-Chi Chan (0000-0002-7739-2116, Royal Holloway University of London), Cham Kit Keith Ming, Wing Yin Anna Tsui (University of Hong Kong) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 673-691 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Social Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0047-2794 • E-ISSN: 1469-7823 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0047279423000673 |
| OpenAlex | W4390585711 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 13 |
| Referências citadas | 49 |
Previous literature suggests that the gig economy and platform work pose challenges to social policy, including the welfare entitlement issues caused by workers' ambiguous occupational status. Focusing on the government's regulatory role, this study investigates platform workers' occupational welfare (OW) by conducting in-depth interviews with forty-six food delivery workers in Hong Kong. The evidence reveals workers' occupational risks resulting from platforms' algorithmic devices and the misclassification of independent contractors. The denied access to private occupational pensions was considered acceptable by workers because of the perceived irrelevance of OW. While interviewees emphasised time-based flexibility as a key intangible benefit, the shifting business costs to self-employed workers was highlighted as a disadvantage. A policy dilemma appears between strengthening state regulation/protection and maintaining workers' temporal autonomy. Arguably, the platformisation of work is translated into the gigification of OW, disentitling platform workers' employer-provided welfare and labour protection. Platforms possess monopolising power over workers, the state displays weak regulatory power to monitor platforms, and workers' occupational citizenship is undermined by the government's minimal intervention. This study contributes to the literature by linking OW to platform work and revealing how the gig economy reshapes social policy, empirically offering a worker-centred analysis of OW in Hong Kong
Autonomy · Business · Dilemma · Economics · Entitlement (fair division) · Flexibility (engineering) · Government (linguistics) · Labour economics · Management · Market economy · Political science · Social Welfare · Welfare · Welfare state · Work (physics) · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Employment and Welfare Studies · Engineering · Law · Sharing Economy and Platforms
Free agents concepts
Visible but precarious
From flexibility to fragility
Rethinking disability employment in the digital era
Risks, rewards and responsibilities
Not all algorithmic controls are equal
Spaces, social networks, and coping strategies
Social protection, labour regulation and market creation
Flexible Choice or No Choice
Social risks, platform economy, and welfare regime
Exploring factors influencing entry into the gig economy
Central-local relations, accountability, and defensive administration
Investigating social protection amongst platform workers in Germany
Work after Globalization
A Step-by-Step Guide to Qualitative Data Coding
The Thought of Work
Citizenship and Social Class
Big Data and the Welfare State
Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia
Adapting social protection to the needs of multiple jobholders in Denmark, the United Kingdom and Germany
Who receives occupational welfare? The importance of skills across Europe’s diverse industrial relations regimes
Missing voices? Integrating worker voice and social dialogue in the platform economy
Regulating work in the gig economy
Who Gets and Who Gives Employer-Provided Benefits? Evidence from Matched Employer-Employee Data
Transforming employer responsibilities
Digitalisation and social security in the EU. The case of platform work
Digital industrial accidents
Platform power and regulatory politics
Ethical’ artificial intelligence in the welfare state
Mandatory occupational welfare
Comparing occupational welfare in Europe
At the heart of the Nordic occupational welfare model
Sixty years after Titmuss
Digital by default? A qualitative study of exclusion in digitalised welfare
Commitment to Welfare
Social protection systems and the future of work
Introduction
Revisiting conflict
Platform work and access to social protection across major European countries
Socio-Economic Performance of European Welfare States in Technology-Induced Employment Scenarios
Food for Thought
The Gig Economy
Delivering Solidarity
Precarious Lives
East Asian Varieties of Capitalism and Socio-Economic Inequality
Work in the Gig-Economy
No South Asian Riders, Please
Institutions, Occupations and Connectivity
The Side Hustle Safety Net
What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy
Technology and homecare in the UK
The Schumpeterian Consensus
Can Robots Understand Welfare? Exploring Machine Bureaucracies in Welfare-to-Work
Digital Social Policy
Using Artificial Intelligence to classify Jobseekers
Crafting the Financial-Subject
Analyses in the Social Division of Welfare
Dependence and precarity in the platform economy
| Obras citantes distintas | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 6,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 13 |