Rights and Responsibilities Are Substitutable Framings That Differentially Affect Judgment

Do employers have a responsibility to treat their workers equally or do employees have a right to be treated equally? In common discourse, rights and responsibilities are often used as substitutable framings for the same event, but they may differentially shape judgment. In this investigation, we develop an experimental manipulation of rights versus responsibilities and evaluate whether framing an arrangement between two parties in terms of rights, versus responsibilities, affects people’s judgment. We found that people judged unequal distributions between two parties as less fair when framed in terms of rights than in terms of responsibilities. Furthermore, people judged a rights framing as fairer for an unequal (vs. equal) contractual agreement. Thus, a subtle framing manipulation can increase or decrease people’s sensitivity to unequal distributions. We discuss potential mechanisms for this effect and implications for behavioral law as well as the potential to nudge people’s sensitivity to inequality

Inequality · Law and economics · Political science · Sociology · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

• Colonialism and Relative Preferences for (In)Equality

  Open Access•Anne Lehner, Starlett Hartley et al.•Journal of Social Issues•2025

  Incluir item

• Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning

  Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld•The Yale Law Journal•1917

  Incluir item

• When and Why We See Victims as Responsible

  Open Access•Laura Niemi, L Young•Personality and Social Psychology…•2016

  Incluir item

• The four elementary forms of sociality

  Alan Page Fiske•Psychological Review•1992

  Incluir item

• Promotion and Prevention

  E Tory Higgins•Advances in Experimental Social…•1998

  Incluir item

• Moral psychology is relationship regulation

  Tage Shakti Rai, Tage Shakti et al.•Psychological Review•2011

  Incluir item

• Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1

  Open Access•Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2009

  Incluir item

• Obligation

  Robert M Cover•Journal of Law and Religion•1987

  Incluir item

• Beyond the Overall Balance

  Open Access•Jacqueline J Goodnow•Social Justice Research•1998

  Incluir item

• The good-provider role

  J Bernard•American Psychologist•1981

  Incluir item

• Do cultural values predict individuals' moral attitudes? A cross‐cultural multilevel approach

  Open Access•Christin-Melanie Vauclair, Christin‐Melanie Vauclair et al.•European Journal of Social…•2011

  Incluir item

• Culture and the self

  Hazel Rose Markus, Shinobu Kitayama•Psychological Review•1991

  Incluir item

• Implicit theories and conceptions of morality

  Chi-Yue Chiu, Chi‐yue Chiu et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1997

  Incluir item

• Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations

  J Graham, Jonathan Haidt et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2009

  Incluir item

• Anomalies

  Open Access•Daniel Kahneman, Jack L Knetsch et al.•The Journal of Economic…•1991

  Incluir item

• Toward a Cultural Theory of Duties

  Open Access•F M Moghaddam, Nikki Slocum et al.•Culture & Psychology•2000

  Incluir item

• A Theory of Cultural Value Orientations

  Shalom H Schwartz, Shalom Schwartz•Comparative Sociology•2006

  Incluir item